DISPARITAS TUNTUTAN OLEH JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM TERHADAP PENYALAH GUNA NARKOTIKA DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI TOBA SAMOSIR

Marlya Retta Bangun, Surya Perdana

Abstract


Criminal disparities have deep consequences for convicts, namely the loss of the convict's sense of justice. In terms of the profession of judges in making decisions, disparity is the freedom given by law to judges to decide cases, freedom is given to judges because the facts of case trials are different from other cases. Meanwhile, on the prosecutor's side, the disparity of demands is also a form of freedom for the Public Prosecutor in processing the perpetrators of criminal acts. The factors causing the disparity in the prosecution of the public prosecutor for the crime are due to errors in the application of the article by the public prosecutor, and the calculation of the qualifications of the defendant's actions, and there is no regulation if the defendant has a dual role as a user or dealer; the impact of criminal disparity brought dissatisfaction to the Defendant and even society in general, as well as social jealousy and negative views by the community. Efforts to reduce the disparity in the demands of the Public Prosecutor at the Toba Samosir District Prosecutor's Office by implementing Guidelines Number 11 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Narcotics Crime Cases and/or narcotics crimes. So that criminal charges are prepared with a special approach, taking into account the qualifications of the crime, the role of the defendant, the type and weight of the evidence, and the casuistic circumstances in a comprehensive and proportional manner.


Keywords


Disparity, Prosecutors, Narcotics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Kadir Muhammad, Etika Profesi Hukum, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 1997;

Abul Khair dan Mohammad Ekaputra, Pemidanaan, USU Press, Medan, 2011;

Bismar Nasution, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Perbandingan Hukum, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, 2003;

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana, Cahaya Atma Pustaka, Yogyakarta, 2015;

Yusti Probowati Rahayu, Dibalik Putusan Hakim (kajian Pisikologi Hukum dalam Perkara Pidana), Citra Media, Sidoarjo, 2005;

Mardani, Penyalahgunaan Narkotika dalam perspektif Hukum Islam dan Hukum Pidana Nasional, Raja

Grafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2008;

Muladi dan Barda Nawawi Arief, Teori Teori dan Kebijakan Pidana. Alumni Bandung, 2004;

Ediwarman, Monograf Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Panduan Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi), Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Medan, 2014;

Herbert Sitanggang, Timbulnya Disparitas pidana dalam putusan delik pembunuhan biasa, Jurnal FH USU, Medan, 2006;

Ifdhal kasim, Membebaskan Hukum, Pengantar Jurnal Ilmu social Transformatif Wacana,Edisi 6 Tahun II-2000,

Romli Atmasasmita, Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Binacipta, bandung, 1996;

Litbang Mahkamah Agung, Kedudukan dan Relevansi Yurisprudensi untuk Mengurangi Disparitas Putusan Pengadilan Puslitbang Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI, Mahkamah Agung, Jakarta, 2010;

Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Rekonstruksi Konsep Pemidanaan: Suatu Gugatan Terhadap Proses Legislasi dan Pemidanaan di Indonesia, Komisi Hukum Nasional, Jakarta, 2003;

http://devidarmawan.wordpress.com/, Problematika Disparitas, diakses tanggal 27 April 2022;

Konsep Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana yang baru buku I tahun 1982;

Undang Nomor 35 tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, Pasal 1 ayat (1)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share