Optimization of Improving Organizational Citizenship Behaviour (OCB) through Personality Strengthening, Interpersonal Communication, and Organizational Justice
Abstract
In educational institutions, teachers are a core part of the management element. Teachers who successfully carry out their main tasks and have the awareness to do something extra will be the key to the success of the organization. Extra activities carried out by teachers that are not directly related to the provisions regarding payroll are called OCB (Organizational Citizenship Behavior). Based on preliminary research, it was found that teachers at SMK PGRI Bogor Regency had relatively low OCB. Therefore, research was needed to obtain good information about other variables that were possibly used to increase OCB. The purpose of this study is to improve teacher OCB by conducting research on the relationship between personality, interpersonal communication, and organizational justice. This study used correlational statistical analysis methods to determine the relationship between the variables studied and the SITOREM method for indicator analysis in order to obtain optimal solutions in order to improve teacher OCB. The population of this study were 289 teachers of SMK PGRI in Bogor Regency. From the population, samples were taken using the Slovin formula and a sample of 168 people was obtained. The results of the analysis using the correlation method show that there is a positive relationship between personality and OCB with a correlation coefficient of ry1 = 0.603. It indicated that personality strengthening can increase OCB. There is a positive relationship between interpersonal communication and OCB with a correlation coefficient ry2 = 0,518 which indicated strengthening interpersonal communication can increase OCB. There is a positive relationship between organizational justice and OCB with a correlation coefficient of ry3 = 0.512 meaning that organizational justice can increase OCB. From the SITOREM analysis, the optimal solution is obtained. Of the 23 indicators studied, there are 14 indicators in good condition so these indicators only need to be maintained or developed, and there are 9 indicators that are still weak so they need to be improved. A priority order for their handling complements improvements to indicators that are still weak. Good indicators are supportive behaviour, technical factors, social status, friendliness, self-disclosure, openness to experience, emotional stability, prudence, wisdom, equality, consistency, maintaining ethics, being informative, and self-respect. The indicators that need to be improved in order of priority for handling are as follows: 1) Trust, 2) Openness, 3) Appreciation for inspiration, 4) Needs, 5) Politeness, 6) Virtue, 7) Prudence, 8) Sportsmanship, and 9 ) Altruism.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Dennis W. Organ. OCB: Its Construct Clean-Up Time?. Human Performance, 10 (2) 85-87, 1977
Fred Luthans, Organizational Behavior, (New York : McGraw-Hill, 2011), h.126
McShane and Von Glinow.,Organizational Behavior, (New York : McGrawHill, 2010), h.151
John M. Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske and Michael T. Matteson, Organization Behavior and Management, Eight Editon (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008), h. 361
Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., dan Bloodgood, J.M. (2002). Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organization?. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002 pp. 502 522
Atika Modassir, Tripti Singh, Relationship of Emotional Intelligence with Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior,
International Journal of Leadership Studies, Vol. 4 Iss. 1, 2008, pp. 3-21
2008 School of Global Leadership & Entrepreneurship, Regent
University, ISSN 1554-3145
Jennifer M. George, Gareth R. Jones, Understanding and Managing
Organizational Behavior (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002), h. 95
Angelo Knicki, Brian K. Williams; Management: A. Practical Introduction?
Third Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008) p.359
J.A. C0lquitt, J.A Lepine, M.J. Wesson, Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill,2011, pp. 294-296
James L. Gibson, et.al, Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (New
York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012), h. 107
Stephen P. Robbins dan Timothy A. Judge, Organizational behavior, 11th Edition (New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013), h. 133.
Fred Luthans, OrganizationIal Behavior, twelfth edition (New York: McGrawHill internasional Editon, 2011) hh. 252-253.
Hellriegel dan Slocum. 2011. Organizational Behavior 13th edition. South-Western Cengage Learning: USA.
Richard M. Ryckman, Theories of Personality (USA: Thomson Higher Education, 2008), h. 4
John R. Schermerhorn, et. al., Organizational Behavior, Edition (New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011), h. 406.
Neil anderson Deniz s. Ones Handan kepir sinangil Chockalingam
viswesvaran,Handbook of Industrial, work And organizational Psychology,
Volume 2 (Sage production, 2001), h. 193
John R. Schermerhorn, et. al., Organizational Behavior, Edition (New York:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011), h. 406
John R. Schermerhorn, Jr., James G. Hunt, Organizational Behavior?-11th
edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010, p.31 Sons,
Richard L Daft, Management, Eight Edition, (Printed in the United States of
America,2008) ,h.563
McShane, Von Glinow, Organizational Behavior, Fifth Edition? (United States: McGraw-Hill, 2010), h. 17
Brant R. Burleson, The Nature of interpersonal communication, dikutip dari google e-book, handbook of communication science, h. 146
John M. Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske, and Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012), h.125
Fred Luthans. Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach?. 12th. Edition. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011), pp. 149-150.
Devito, J.A (2009) Interpersonal Communication Book, New York, Pearson Educational, Inc
Stephen P. Robbins dan Timothy A. Judge, Organizational behavior, 11th Edition (New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013), h. 133.
Duane Schultz and Sydney Ellen Schultz, Psychology and Work Today, (New Jersey: Pearson education, 2006), h.237.
Jerald Greenberg, Managing Behavior Organizations, (New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2003), h.36.
John M. Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske, Michael T.Matteson, Organizational
Behavior And Management 9th Ed., NY: Mcgraw-Hill Companies, 2011, P. 129
Ccc George dan Jones, 2005, Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior 4th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall. cc
Husein Umar. 2013. Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis. Jakarta: Rajawali
Sugiyono (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hardhienata, S., The Development of Scientific Identification Theory to Conduct Operation Research in Education Management, IOP Conference Series: Matetials Science and Engineering, Volume 166, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1757- 899X/166/I/012017.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/ijems.v3i3.12105
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematics Science
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Kampus Utama
Jl. Kapten Muchtar Basri No.3, Glugur Darat II,Medan
Sumatera Utara-20238
E-mail: ijems@umsu.ac.id
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.