Students' Mathematical Problem Abilities Improvement Using Blended Learning Reviewed From The Initial Ability of Students
The purpose of this study is to see an increase in students' mathematical problem-solving abilities taught by using a blended learning model in terms of the initial ability of high school students. Blended learning is digital-based learning by using digital learning media as aids in learning. This learning is done as a form of implementation of Education 4.0-based learning which the impact of the existence of Industrial Revolution 4.0. This research uses a quasi-experimental type with a pre-test post-test control design research design. The sampling technique was carried out using purposive sampling and obtained as many as 28 students who were in the experimental group (who were taught using a blended learning model) and 25 students who were in the control group (who were taught using ordinary learning). The results of testing normality and homogeneity of data using Levenes' test and Kolmogorov-Smirnov analysis obtained the results that the data in both learning groups were normally distributed and homogeneous. Referring to the prerequisite test results, hypothesis testing is performed using a Two-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA Two Path). The results of hypothesis testing indicate that there is an increase in students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities that are taught using blended learning models in terms of students' initial mathematical abilities. This result strengthens the evidence that the use of blended learning models has a significant effect on improving students' mathematical abilities and provides new learning experiences for students.
Akyüz, H. I., & Samsa, S. (2009). The effects of the blended learning environment on the critical thinking skills of students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1744-1748. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.308
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: three different design approaches. Australias Journal of Education Technology, 30(4).
Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth-grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424
Baro, E. E. (2011). A survey of information literacy education in library schools in Africa. Library Review, 60(3), 202-217.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. Arlington: ISTE.
Borba, M., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, G., & Aguilar, M. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning, and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589-610. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4
Dalle, J., & Ariffin, A. M. (2018). The Impact of Technologies in Teaching Interaction Design. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control System, 04(special issue), 1779-1783.
Derlina, Dalle, J., Hadi, S., Mutalib, A. A., & Sumantri, C. (2018). Signaling principles in interactive learning media through experts' walkthrough. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(4), 147-162. doi:10.17718/tojde.471911
Drysdale, J. S., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., & Halverson, L. R. (2013). An analysis of research trends in dissertations and theses studying blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 90-100.
Dzakiria, H., Wahab, M., & Abdul Rahman, H. D. (2013). Action research on blended learning transformative potential in higher education-learner perspectives. Business Management Research, 1(2), 125-134.
Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205-209. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006
Fazal, M., & Bryant, M. (2019). Blended learning in middle school math: the question of effectiveness. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(1), 49–64.
Gelisli, Y. (2009). The effect of student-centered instructional approaches on student success. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 469-473. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.085
Graham, C. (2006). Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Bonk, & C. Graham, Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. San Fransisco: CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Gurat, G., & Guzman Gurat, M. (2018). Mathematical problem-solving strategies among student teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3), 53–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2018.110302
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present, and future of blended learning: an in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596-4603. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992
Harahap, M. (2018). Industry revolution 4.0 and its implication on the teacher's role in the 21st century in education. Proceedings of the National Seminar on the Faculty of Social Sciences, Medan State University, 2, pp. 578-580. Medan. Retrieved from http://semnasfis.unimed.ac.id/
Hastjarjo, T. D. (2019). Quasi-experimental design. Buletin Psikologi, 27(2), 187-203. doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38619
Jones, N. (2006). E-College Wales, a case study of blended learning. In C. Bonk, & C. Graham, Handbook of blended learning: global perspectives, local designs (pp. 182-194). San Fransisco: Pfeiffer Publishing.
Judi, H., & Sahari, N. (2013). Student-centered learning in statistics: analysis of systematic review. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 844-851. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.406
Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012, October 8). Overcoming students obstacles in multivariable calculus through blended learning: a mathematical thinking approach. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 579-586. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.691
Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Yusof, Y. M. (2012). Supporting engineering students’ thinking and creative problem solving through blended learning. Procedia Social Behavioral Sciences, 117-125. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.638
Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., Yusof, Y. M., & Rahman, R. A. (2012). Supporting students' mathematical thinking in the learning of two-variable functions through blended learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3689-3695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.128
Kaur, M. (2013). Blended learning-its challenges and future. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612-617. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248
Krajnc, M. (2012). E-learning usage during chemical engineering courses. In S. Kofuji, E-learning engineering, on the job training and interactive teaching (pp. 123-138). Brazil: InTech. doi:10.5772/29507
Krishnan, S. (2015). Student-centered learning in a first-year undergraduate course. International Journal of Learning, Teaching, and Educational Research, 11(2), 88-95.
Lase, D. (2019, November 7). Education in the fourth industrial revolution age. Sundermann Journal, 1(1), 28-43. doi:10.36588/sundermann.v1i1.18
Lilla, K. (2014). Blended learning in teaching mathematics at primary and secondary school. 13th Conference on Applied Mathematics APLIMAT 2014. Bratislava.
Lin, Y.-W., Tseng, C.-L., & Chiang, P.-J. (2017). The effect of blended learning in a mathematics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. doi:https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a
Lopes, A., & Soares, F. (2018). Flipping a mathematics course, a blended learning approach. Proceedings of INTED2018 Conference, (pp. 3844–3853). Spain.
Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and education 4.0.-the teaching factory 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23, 129-134. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005
Mullis, I., Martin, M., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS Advanced 2015 International Results in Advanced Mathematics and Physics. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/advanced/
Murtikusuma, R. P., Hobri, Fatahillah, A., Hussen, S., Prasetyo, R. R., & Alfarisi, M. A. (2019). Development of blended learning based on Google Classroom using culture theme in mathematics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1165/1/012017
Nazarenko, A. (2015). Blended learning vs traditional learning: what works? (a case study research). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 77-82. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.018
Ngaeni, E., & Saefudin, A. (2017, December ). Creating effective mathematic learning in mathematical problem solving with problem-posing learning model. Axiom Mathematics Education Journal, 264-274. doi:10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.896
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results: Combined Executive Summaries, Volume I, II & III. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf
Özreçberoğlu, N., & Çağanağa, Ç. (2018). Making it count: Strategies for improving problem-solving skills in mathematics for students and teachers’ classroom management. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1253–1261.
Polya, G. (2014). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Powell, A., Watson, J., Staley, P., Patrick, S., Horn, M., Fetzer, L., . . . Verma, S. (2015, July). Promising practices in blended and online learning. Blended learning: the evolution of online and face-to-face education from 2008-2015. International Association for K-12 Online Learning-INACOL. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/
Ramadhani, R. (2018). The enhancement of mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of students through problem-based learning. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(1), 127–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v5i1.13269
Ramadhani, R., Astuti, E., & Setiawati, T. (2019). The implementation of LMS-Google classroom to improving competence skill of Senior high School Teachers' in Industrial Revolution 4.0. AMALIAH: Journal of Community Service, 3(2), 327-335. doi:https://doi.org/10.32696/ajpkm.v3i2.286
Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., Abdurrahman, A., & Syazali, M. (2019). The effect of the flipped-problem based learning model integrated with LMS-Google classroom for Senior High School students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 137–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.548350
Rossiter, J. A. (2006). Blended learning: some case studies from control engineering. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (pp. 523-528). Elsevier Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.3182/20060621-3-ES-2905.00090
Russell, C. (2014, March). Student-centered definition of blended learning. 1-2. UWS Blade network.
Samo, D. D. (2017). Competence of students problem-solving in the first year on the problem of cultural context geometry. Journal of Mathematics Education Researc, 4(2), 141-152. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.13470
Setyaningrum, W. (2018). Blended learning: does it help students in understanding mathematical concepts? Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 5(2), 244-253. Retrieved from http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm
Singer, F. M., & Stoicescu, D. (2011). Using blended learning as a tool to strengthen teaching competences. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 1527-1531. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2011.01.043
Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction on students' performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439-443. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098
Widiara, I. K. (2018). Blended learning as an instructional alternative in the digital era. Purwadita, 2(2), 50-56.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.