An Analysis on the Impact of Participatory Budgeting and Procedura Fairness Toward Manager's Commitment and Performance

Widia Astuty

Abstract


This study aims to test the effect of participatory budgeting and procedural fairness on the manager's commitment and performance either hove simultaneous or partial effect. The method of the research used was a survey method that conducted at the pawnshop in North Sumatra with the respondents of the managers in branch offices. The data used is primary data by collecting data through questionnaires. The analysis method used is descriptive-analytical verification. The effect model analyzed &sing a structural equation model to analyze the pattern of causal relationships Sween variables and determine the direct, indirect and total effect of some variables. The results showed that participatory budgeting ond procedural fairness simultanay have a significant and positive effect El the manager's commitment; participatory budgeting has a significant and positive effect an the manager's cammitmenb; procedural fairness has a significant andllsitive effect on the manager's commitment articipatory budgeting, procedural fairness and manager's commitment simultaneously 'has a si :;: icant and positive effect on the manager's performance; the effect o participatory budgetin as a significant and ositive effect on the anager's performance; hQrocedural fairness os a signi icanb and ositive effect an the manager's performance; the manager's commitment has a significant and positive effect on thena er's performance.


Keywords


Participatory budgeting, procedural fairness; manager's commitment, manager's performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anthony, N. R., & Vijay, G. (2003). MfDgement Control System. Irwin-McGraw-Hill.

Binberg, J., Shields, M., & Mc Innes. (1986). Budgetary Participation, Motivation and Managerial Performa The Accounting Review, 9(4), 587-600.

Crapanzano, R., & Folger, R. (1991). Procedural Justice ond Worker Motivation, In Motivation and Work Behavior. Edited by R.M. Staw, & L.W. Porter. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Chong, Vincent, K., & Ming, C.K. (2002). Budget Goal Commitment and Informational Effects of Budget Participation on Performance: Astructural Equation Modeling Approach. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14

Folger, R.D., Rosenfeld & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative Deprivation and Procedural Justification. Jouna.Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268-273.

Ferdinand, A. (2000). Structural Equation Modeling Oalam Penelitian Manajemen. Aplikasi ModelDdel Rumit Dalam Penelitian Untuk Tesis 5-2 & Disertasi 5-3 (Application of Research Models). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Govindarajan, V. (1986 . Impact of Participation in Budgetary Process on. Attitudes and Performalt: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decisions Sciences, 196-516.

Guilford, J.P. (1956). Psychometric Method. New York: aw-Hill Book Company Inc.

Hollebeck, John R., Charles R., Williams, & Howard, J. K. (1989). An Empirical Examination of The AntercedtD of Commitment to Difficult Goals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 18-23.

Hansen, Don R., & Maryanne M. Mowen, (2005). Management Accounting, 7th USA, International, Thomson Phing.

Kennis, lzzetin, 1979. Effect of Budgetary Goal Characteristic on Managerial Attitudes and Performance, The Accounting Review, Vol lfl4) pp 707-721.

Deitner, R., & Angelo K. (2000). Organizotionol Behavior. Mc Graw-Hill Companies, New Yori<.

Libby, T. (1999). The Influence of Voice and Explanation on Performance in A Participative Budgeting Setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 125-137.

Lindquist, T. M. (1995). Fairness as Antecedent to Participative Budgeting: Examining The Effects ofl Distrutive Uustice, Procedural Justice and Referent Cognition on Satisfaction and Performance. Journal o Management Accounting Research, 7, 122-142.

FJaryanto (2004). Perum Pegadaian: Selayang Pandang Sejarah Pegadaian.

Milani, K. (1975). The Relationship of Participation in Budget Setting to Industrial Supervisor Performance and Attitude: A Field Study. The Accounting Review.

Murray, D. (1990). The Performance Effect of Participative Budgeting: An Integration of lntervenirGJnd Moderating Variables. Behavioral Reseach in Accounting, 104-123.

Mulyasari, W., & Sugiri, S. (2005). Keadilan, Komitmen Pada Tujuan, dan Job Relevan lnformati , alam Penganggaran Partisipatif. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, 8(3), 310-324.

Otley, D. (1978). Budget Use and Managerial Performance. Journal Accounting Research, 16, 122-149.

Shields, J.F. & Shields (1998). Antecendents of Participative Budgeting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 49-76.

Shields, M. D., & Young (1993). Antecedents and Consequences of Participative Budgeting: Evidence on the Effects of Asymmetrical Information. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 265- 280.

Shields, M. D., Deng, Johny, F., & Kato, Y. (2000). The Design and Effects of Control Systems: Test of Direct-and Indirect-Effects Models. Accounting Organizations and Society, 25, 185-202.

Siegel, G., & Helena Ramanauskas-Marconi (1989). Behavioral Accounting. Cincinatti: South Western Gications Company.

Singarimbun, M.,EJEffendi, S. (1995). Metode Penelitian Survay. Edisi Revisi, LP3ES, Jakarta.

Widia, A. (2012). Pengaruh Lingkungan Bisnis terhadap lnformasi Akuntansi Manajemen, dan Penganggaran dampaknya terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan. Trikonomika, Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Pasundanmrakreditasi Dikti Nomor 110/DIKTI/Kep/ 2009, 11, 160-175

Wentzel, K. (2002). The Influence of Fairness Perceptions and Goal Commitment on Mana ers Performance in A Budget Setting. Behavioral Research i counting, 14, 247-271.

Yusfaningrum, Kusnasriyati & Ghozali, I. (2005). Analisis Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Melalui Komitmen Tujuan Anggaran don Job Relevant Information Sebagai Variabel Intervening. Kumpulan Materi Simposiun Nasional Akuntansi, Solo, 15-16 September 2005, 656- 666.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.