Legal Action Against Of Notary Supervisory Board Decision

Erwin Asmadi

Abstract


The Notary Supervisory Board has the authority to supervise the Notary Public and in order to carry out this authority the Notary Supervisory Board issues decisions related to violations committed by Notaries. The method used is secondary data sourced from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The decision of the Notary Supervisory Board for the central level is final and binding. If then there are parties who are not satisfied with the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board, what legal remedies can be taken by the dissatisfied party. Based on the research conducted, the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board can be categorized as a state administration decision which is a competency of the Administrative Court to examine, hear, and decide upon it. Therefore, if there are parties who are dissatisfied with the decision of the Notary Supervisory Board, then they can submit legal remedies to the Administrative Court.

Keywords: Decision, Notary Supervisory Board, Administrative Court


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, A., Theory & Practice of Post-Amendment State Administrative Court Judiciary (Jakarta: Kencana, 2017).

Adjie, H., Civil and Administrative Sanctions Against a Notary Public Officer, (Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2008).

Hadita, Cynthia. Registrasi Data Pribadi Melalui Kartu Prabayar Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (Provision of Personal Information in Prepaid SIM Card Registration from Human Rights Perspective), Jurnal HAM, Vol. 9, No. 2, December (2018).

Kurniingsih, S., "Comparative Study of Notary Oversight according to the Notary Position Law Number 30 of 2004 and the Decree of the Results of the Congress of the Indonesian Notary Association Code of Conduct (Analysis of Cases of Violation of the Notary Code of Ethics in Surabaya)", Thesis, Depok: Magister Notary of the Faculty of Law University of Indonesia, (2010).

Notary Supervisory Board, (2016), Guidelines for Notary Supervisory Board, Jakarta: Directorate General of General Law Administration Ministry of Law and Human Rights Republic of Indonesia.

Sihombing, Eka N.A.M. Eksistensi Paralegal dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum bagi Masyarakat Miskin (The Existence of Paralegals in Providing Legal Aid to the Poor), Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum,Vol. 6, No. 1, June (2019).

Syaputra, M.Y.A., "Legal Study of Enactment of Medan City Regulation Number 6 Year 2003 Perspective of Utilities Theory", Mercatoria, Vol. 10 (2), December 2017: 197 - 215, (2017).

Asmadi, E. (2018). Peran Psikiater dalam Pembuktian Kekerasan Psikis Pada Korban Tindak Pidana Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(1), 39-51.

Asmadi, E. (2013). Pembuktian tindak pidana terorisme: analisa putusan pengadilan pada kasus perampokan Bank CIMB Niaga Medan. PT. Sofmedia.

Regulasi Mandiri Transportasi Online dalam Pembayaran Pesanan Makanan atas Konsumen yang Ingkar Janji




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v1i1.4285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.