Comparative In Vitro Analysis of Propolis and 3% Hydrogen Peroxide as Cerumenolytic Agents in Children
Abstract
Abstract: Cerumen impaction is a common otologic problem that can impair hearing and predispose individuals to external ear infections. This in vitro study aimed to compare the cerumenolytic effects of propolis and 3% hydrogen peroxide using spectrophotometric absorbance measurements at 5, 10, 15, and 30 minutes. A total of 48 cerumen samples were collected from children at Panti Asuhan Putri Aisyiyah Medan and divided equally into two treatment groups. Absorbance values were analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests due to non-normal data distribution. Propolis demonstrated a progressive increase in absorbance over time, reaching its highest effect at 30 minutes, whereas hydrogen peroxide showed minimal changes with no significant time-dependent pattern. Comparative analysis revealed that propolis produced significantly higher absorbance values than hydrogen peroxide at all time points (p < 0.001), indicating superior cerumen dissolution. These findings suggest that propolis may serve as a more effective and potentially safer alternative to hydrogen peroxide for cerumen management. Further in vivo and clinical studies are recommended to validate its therapeutic applicability and long-term safety.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Tolan MM, Choi JS, Tibesar MT, Adams ME. Cerumen impaction: Prevalence and associated factors in the United States population. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024;9(2):e1228.
Gurunathan RK, Perry M. The Ear and Associated Structures: Part II. In: Diseases and Injuries to the Head, Face and Neck: A Guide to Diagnosis and Management. Springer; 2021:1511-1587.
Chaudhary AK. Procedure of Clearing of External Ear Canal. In: Common Ear Diseases in Dogs: Diagnosis and Management. Bentham Science Publishers; 2025:62-76.
Suresh S, Suresh S, Sivasamy S. Indonesian Journal of Medical Sciences and Public Health. Indones J Med Sci Public Heal. 2021;2(1):28-39.
Dudley A. Update on Cerumen Impaction Management in Older Adults. J Nurse Pract. 2024;20(9):105154.
Maiti SK, Sarkar VK, Sinha S. Ceruminoliths and its clinical Management. Common Ear Dis Dogs Diagnosis Manag. Published online 2025:149-159.
Gupta T, Bhutta MF. Ear wax and its removal: current practices and recommendations. Hear J. 2023;76(09):22-23.
Lian Y, Yuan K, Nie L, Xiao L, Ding L. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of manual removal and irrigation in cerumen removal in children. Sci Prog. 2025;108(2):00368504251345886.
Urakova NA, Urakov AL. Hydrogen peroxide: potential for repurposing into an oxygen-producing antihypoxant by generating oxygen gas. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2025;15.
Anh NQ, Numthavaj P, Bhongmakapat T. Comparison of the Cerumenolytic Activities of New and Currently Used Agents. Ear, Nose Throat J. 2022;101(2_suppl):31S-36S. doi:10.1177/0145561320986060
Machado A, Zamora-Mendoza L, Alexis F, Álvarez-Suarez JM. Use of plant extracts, bee-derived products, and probiotic-related applications to fight multidrug-resistant pathogens in the post-antibiotic era. Futur Pharmacol. 2023;3(3):535-567.
Javed S, Mangla B, Ahsan W. From propolis to nanopropolis: An exemplary journey and a paradigm shift of a resinous substance produced by bees. Phyther Res. 2022;36(5):2016-2041.
Ghallab D, Shawky E, Mohyeldin M, Metwally AM, Ibrahim RS. Propolis: An update on its chemical diversity, botanical origin and biological activities. J Adv Pharm Sci. 2025;2(1):76-99.
Rana A, Malik A, Sobti RC. Anti-bacterial properties of propolis: A comprehensive review. Curr Microbiol. 2025;82(10):1-21.
Chuttong B, Lim K, Praphawilai P, et al. Exploring the functional properties of propolis, geopropolis, and cerumen, with a special emphasis on their antimicrobial effects. Foods. 2023;12(21):3909.
Zulhendri F, Lesmana R, Tandean S, et al. Recent update on the anti-inflammatory activities of propolis. Molecules. 2022;27(23):8473.
El-Seedi HR, Eid N, Abd El-Wahed AA, et al. Honey bee products: preclinical and clinical studies of their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties. Front Nutr. 2022;8:761267.
Terra RMO, da Silva KL, Vochikovski L, et al. Effect of daily usage time of 4% hydrogen peroxide on the efficacy and bleaching-induced tooth sensitivity: a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2021;46(4):395-405.
Peršurić Ž, Pavelić SK. Bioactives from bee products and accompanying extracellular vesicles as novel bioactive components for wound healing. Molecules. 2021;26(12):3770.
Yang J, Pi A, Yan L, et al. Research progress on therapeutic effect and mechanism of propolis on wound healing. Evidence‐Based Complement Altern Med. 2022;2022(1):5798941.
Sundar PS, Chowdhury C, Kamarthi S. Evaluation of human ear anatomy and functionality by axiomatic design. Biomimetics. 2021;6(2):31.
Kamm WE, Tolan MM, Kennedy CL, Choi JS, Marmor S, Adams ME. Efficacy of Over‐the‐Counter Cerumen Removal Devices: A Randomized Trial. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2025;10(6):e70313.
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.30596/bf.v12i1.27682.g14636
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JURNAL BULETIN FARMATERA
Gedung Kampus 1 Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (UMSU) Lantai II, Laboratorium Farmakologi dan Terapi Fakultas Kedokteran UMSU Jalan Gedung Arca No. 53 Medan Sumatera Utara Indonesia, Kode Pos 20217.
Contact (WA): 0812-6208-2844
E-mail: farmatera@umsu.ac.id

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

