COMPARISON OF ANGLO SAXON AND CONTINENTAL EUROPEAN LEGAL SYSTEMS

Wahyu Sabrudin

Abstract


Every country including Indonesia has a legal system to regulate its government. The legal system in principle regulates the life of a society so that conflicts do not occur. Even though conflicts cannot be avoided, the legal system has a role in resolving these conflicts. The comparison that will be put forward by the author in this study is the difference in the legal system of the problem, namely Indonesia and the Netherlands are countries that adhere to the civil law system, while Australia adheres to the common law system, where the fundamental difference between the two legal systems can be seen in the legal system Civil Law takes a written form which is codified in statutes. Meanwhile, the Common Law legal system refers more to customary law, which tends to be unwritten. Although the main legal source of Civil Law is statutory regulations, jurisprudence also has an important role in applying law to the Civil Law system. In contrast to the Common Law legal system, where the main source of law is jurisprudence (judge made by law/binding force of precedent), where legal issues are resolved by case and the results are reflected in judge decisions (jurisprudence).

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Kautsar, I. Muhammad, D. W. (2022). “sistem hukum modern lawrance m. Friedman: budaya hukum dan perubahan sosial masyarakat dari industrial ke digital”, Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 7 Nomor 2.

Aulia, F, Al-Fatih, F. (2017). “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law Dan Islamic Law Dalam Perspektif Sejarah Dan Karakteristik Berpikir”, Jurnal Legality Vol. 25 No. 1.

Cipto, H. H. (2009). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atma Jaya.

Cruz, P. (1999). Comparative Law in a Changing World, Cavendish Publishing Limited, London-Sydney.

Friedman, L, M. (2009). Sistem Hukum: Perspektif Ilmu Sosial, ed. M. Khozim, Bandung: Nusa Media.

Koto, I. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Proceding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan, 2 (1).

Koto. I. (2020). “Review Of Criminal Law On The Consumption Of Food And Drug Containing Narcotics And Psychotropics (Analysis Of Decision NO. 17 K/MIL/2016), International Proceeding Of Law & Economics.

Koto, I. (2022). Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Perbuatan Penggunan Merek Yang Sama Pada Pokoknya, SANKSI: Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi.

Kumorotomo, W. (1996). Etika Administrasi Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Lemek, J. (2007). Mencari Keadilan: Pandangan Kritis Terhadap Penegakan Hukum DiIndonesia. Jakarta: Galang Press.

Rahimah & Koto, I. (2022). Implications of Parenting Patterns in the Development of Early Childhood Social Attitudes. IJRS: International Journal Reglement & Society, 3 (2).

Syafiie, I. K. (2003). Sistem Administrasi Negara Republik Indonesia, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Subeitan, S. M, dkk. (2022). “Kewenangan Manusia Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Sebagai Perubahan Hukum,” Pleno Jure 11, No. 1.

Wignjodipoero, S. (1983), Pengantar dan Asas-asas Hukum adat, Jakarta: Gunung Agung.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.