POLICY DIRECTIONS AND AUTHORITIES OF REGENCY/CITY GOVERNMENTS IN THE MARINE AND FISHERIES SECTOR WITH THE EFFECT OF LAW NUMBER 23 OF 2014

Ahmad Duroni Nasution

Abstract


Since the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government, there have been very significant different provisions in determining policies in each region, especially in the maritime and fisheries sector. In the previous regional government regulations, namely Law Number 32 of 2004, regional governments were given the broadest authority to manage resources in marine areas, but since the latest regulations, the maritime and fisheries section is included in concurrent government affairs which must be coordinated between the central government. , provincial government and district/city government. Therefore, it is necessary to further examine the limitations and direction of policy and authority that can be exercised by district/city regional governments in the maritime and fisheries sectors since the enactment of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning Regional Government. The aim of this research is to discover the legal relationship between the central government and regional governments in the marine and fisheries sector, to discover concurrent government affairs between the central government and provincial and district/city regions in the marine and fisheries sector, and to discover the position of district/city governments in Law Number 23 of 2014 in determining policy direction in the marine and fisheries sector. This type of research is normative juridical, while the nature of this research is prescriptive. The data source used is secondary data by processing data from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Document study data collection techniques, as well as using qualitative analysis. Based on the research results, it is known that the legal relationship between the central government and regional governments in the maritime and fisheries sector is part of concurrent government affairs, apart from that, concurrent government affairs are not mandatory government affairs but rather optional government affairs. Then it is understood that concurrent government affairs between the central government and provincial and district/city areas in the marine and fisheries sector as a whole are the authority and responsibility of the central government to make policies in the management of marine and national strategic space, as well as provincial regional governments being given the authority to manage natural resources in the sea in the region. Meanwhile, district/city governments are limited to supervising and empowering small fishermen and fish cultivation in district/city areas. Finally, it is known that the position of district/city governments in Law Number 23 of 2014 in determining policy direction in the marine and fisheries sector is limited to the empowerment of small fishermen and empowerment of fish cultivation businesses.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Imron, M. (2011). “Otonomi Daerah Dan Permasalahannya Dalam Pengelolaan Kelautan”. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya, Volume 13, Nomor 1.

Ismatullah, D dan Beni Ahmad Saebani. (2018). Hukum Tata Negara: Refleksi Kehidupan Ketatanegaraan di Negara Republik Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.

Kaho, J. R. (1998). Prospek Otonomi Daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia. (Jakarta : CV. Rajawali.

Koto, I. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Terorisme, Proceding Seminar Nasional Kewirausahaan, 2 (1).

Koto. I. (2020). “Review Of Criminal Law On The Consumption Of Food And Drug Containing Narcotics And Psychotropics (Analysis Of Decision NO. 17 K/MIL/2016), International Proceeding Of Law & Economics.

Koto, I. (2022). Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Perbuatan Penggunan Merek Yang Sama Pada Pokoknya, SANKSI: Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi.

Mawardi Khairi. (2020). “Kewenangan Pemerintah Daerah Provinsi Dalam Pemberian Izin Pengelolaan Perairan Di Wilayah Pesisir Dan Pulau Pulau Kecil”. urnal Jatiswara, Volume 35, Nomor 3.

Mertokusumo, S dan A. Pitlo. (2017). Bab-bab Tentang Penemuan Hukum. (Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhayat dan Rina Haslita. (2021). “Implementasi Desentralisasi Dalam Pengelolaan Perikanan”. Jurnal JAPS, Volume 2, Nomor 2.

Rahimah & Koto, I. (2022). Implications of Parenting Patterns in the Development of Early Childhood Social Attitudes. IJRS: International Journal Reglement & Society, 3 (2).

Sihombing, Eka N.A.M.. (2018). Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Partisipatif. (Malang: Inteligensia Media.

Sudarsono. (2007). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Sunarno, S. (2016). Hukum Pemerintahan Daerah Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Syahuri, T dan Euodia Oc tavia Sitompul. (2020). “Analisis Yuridis Pengelolaan Batas Wilayah Laut dan Pesisir Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah”. Jurnal Esensi Hukum, Volume 2, Nomor 2.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.