PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN THE PERSPECTIVE OF WESTERN CIVIL LAW AND SHARIA LAW
Abstract
The era of the industrial revolution 4.0 is often referred to as the era of the digital revolution. In this era, the boundaries between biological, digital, and physical seem to merge and become one so that in the end it becomes an era that has the characteristics of automation in all kinds of activities. Educators in today's digital era are required to have 21st century teaching skills to achieve the needs of the superior generation in the digital era. Educational institutions of education personnel are fully responsible for fulfilling teachers with the competencies needed in today's digital era. Micro teaching is one of the teaching methods that is currently given to prospective teacher students to practice teaching skills in the classroom. However, the implementation of micro-teaching is still considered to have many shortcomings, including classroom conditioning which still seems unreal and the lack of student ability to design learning, especially in the current digital era. To answer these problems, researchers analyzed what factors affect micro-teaching in the industrial era 4.0. The focus of this research is on the technology used by lecturers in learning, the learning methods used, the learning environment created, the competence of teachers and the involvement of students in microlearning. This study aims to evaluate the implementation of micro-teaching, whether micro-teaching learning is still relevant to the digital era and to find out what factors are needed to meet the competencies of prospective teachers in the current digital era. The research method used is a quantitative method with research instruments using questionnaires. The results of the study show that the overall analysis of the findings that lecturers and students have used digital technology in microlearning, but with this technology, it turns out that they have not been able to make a positive contribution to students and lecturers. This condition is influenced by the low involvement of students in participating in learning. So that it is difficult for lecturers to recognize their strengths and weaknesses in learning students both independently and in groups.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hernoko, A. Y. (2010). Asas Proporsionalitas dalam Kontrak Komersil. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Zulfahmi, & Maulana, N. (2022). Batasan Riba, Gharar, dan Maisir (Isu Kontemporer Dalam Hukum Bisnis Syariah). SYARAH: JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM DAN EKONOMI, 134-150.
Syafriana, R. (2022). Principle of Legal Settlement in Sharia Contracts. Randwick International of Social Sciences (RISS) Journal, 723-732.
Meher, M., & Ginting, L. (2024). Juridical Review of the Strength of Electronic Evidence To Proof Online Lending Agreement. PENA JUSTISIA: MEDIA KOMUNIKASI DAN KAJIAN, 211-225.
Fuady, M. (2015). Hukum Kontrak. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Simanjuntak, P. (2015). Hukum Perdata Indonesia. Jakarta: Prenada Media Grup.
Suryani, K., & Ginting, L. (2024). Implementasi Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Pinjam Uang (Studi PT.Permodalan Nasional Madani Mekaar). RECHT STUDIOSUM LAW REVIEW, 164-173.
Ramadhani, R., & Ramlan. (2019). Perjanjian Build Operate And Transfer (BOT) Lapangan Merdeka Medan Dalam Pandangan Hukum Administrasi Negara Dan Hukum Bisnis. DELEGALATA, 255-270.
Rachman, A., & et.al. (2022). Dasar Hukum Kontrak (Akad) dan Implementasinya Pada Perbankan Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 47-58.
Arwani, A. (2017). Konstruksi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Fiqh Anggaran Yang Berbasis Akuntasi Syariah. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum.
Ardi, M. (2016). Asas-Asas Perjanjian (Akad), Hukum Kontrak Syariah Dalam Penerapan Salam dan Istisna. Jurnal Hukum Diktum, 265-279.
Munadi. (2018). Asas-Asas Perjanjian Dalam Hukum Kontrak Syariah. Jurnal Alwatzikhoebillah (Kajian Islam, Pendidikan, Ekonomi, dan Humaniora), 98-107.
Zulfahmi, & Maulana, N. (2022). Batasan Riba, Gharar, dan Maisir (Isu Kontemporer Dalam Hukum Bisnis Syariah). Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi, 134-150.
Firdausiah, S. Z. (2020). Kajian Teoritik Terhadap Urgensi Asas Dalam Akad (Kontrak) Syariah. Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum& Ekonomi Syariah, 47-66.
Khairandy, R. (2013). Hukum Kontrak Indonesia dalam Perspektif Perbandingan. Yogyakarta: FH UII.
Saebani, B. A., Mayaningsih, D., & wati, A. (2016). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Retnowati, M. S., & et.al. (2021). Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak dan Asas Keadilan Dalam Transaksi Bisnis. Iqtishaduna: Economic Doctrine, 570-680.
Saisab, R. V., & Et.al. (2021). Kajian Hukum Penerapan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Perjanjian Baku. Lex Privatum , 201-210.
Sinaga, N. A. (2018). Peranan Asas-Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Tujuan Perjanjian. Binamulia Hukum, 107-120.
M.Shalihah, G. K., & et.al. (2022). Tinjauan Terhadap Peranan Asas Hukum Perjanjian Dalam Mewujudkan Hakekat Perjanjian. Lex Privatum.
Cahyono. (n.d.). pn-bandaaceh.go.id. Retrieved from https://pn-bandaaceh.go.id/pembatasan-asas-freedom-of-contract-dalam-perjanjian-komersial/#:~:text=Kebebasan%20berkontrak%20berarti%20kebebasan%20untuk,makna%20yang%20positif%20dan%20negatif.
Emirzon, J., & Sadi, M. (2021). Hukum Kontrak Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Kencana.
Aprita, S., & Wulandari, M. (2023). Hukum Perikatan. Jakarta: Kencana.
Meher, M., & Siregar, F. Y. (2023). Hukum Perjanjian dan Bisnis. Medan: Universitas Medan Area Press.
Anwar, S. (2010). Hukum Perjanjian Syariah: Studi tentang Teori Akad Dalam Fikih Muamalat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hulaify, A. (2019). Asas-Asas Kontrak (Akad) Dalam Hukum Syariah. AT-TADBIR, 41-54.
Lestari, T. W., & Santoso, L. (2017). Komparasi Syarat Keabsahan "Sebab Yang Halal" Dalam Perjanjian Konvensional Dan Perjanjian Syariah. Al Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 1-16.
Firdausiah, S. Z. (2020). Kajian Teoritik Terhadap Urgensi Asas Dalam Akad (Kontrak) Syariah. Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum & Ekonomi Syariah, 47-66.
Yulianti, R. T. (2008). Asas-Asas Perjanjian (Akad) dalam Hukum Kontrak Syari'ah. La_Riba Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 91-107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.22272
DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.22272.g12616
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.