DISPUTE RESOLUTION MODELS IN FINANCIAL TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY-BASED JOINT FUNDING SERVICES

Nurhilmiyah Nurhilmiyah, Indah Purnama Sari, Rasta Kurniawati Br. Pinem, Asliani Asliani, Ida Hanifah

Abstract


The rapid development of financial technology (fintech) and IT-based joint funding services has created new challenges in dispute resolution. In this context, effective and efficient dispute resolution is essential to maintain the sustainability and growth of the fintech industry. This article discusses various dispute resolution models that can be applied to information technology-based funding services, focusing on approaches that can minimize costs and time, as well as improve the satisfaction of the parties involved. The dispute resolution models discussed include settlement through mediation, arbitration, as well as an ever-growing online dispute resolution platform. The existence of a technology platform that allows for quick and transparent dispute resolution is one of the promising alternatives. In addition, the article also analyzes the legal and regulatory challenges faced in the implementation of these models, as well as how related parties, such as fintech service providers and regulators, can collaborate to create an ecosystem that supports fair and efficient dispute resolution. With the right approach, dispute resolution can provide the legal guarantees necessary to strengthen user trust in information technology-based funding services.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Anggriawan, T. P., Puspitosari, H., Wardhani, S. K., & Tengpongsthorn, W. (2023). The Urgency of Online Non-Litigation Settlement in Business Disputes in Information Technology-Based Co-Funding Services.

Hardjomuljadi, Sarwono. (2016), Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi di Indonesia, Bandung: Logoz Publishing.

Barkatullah, Abdul Halim; Prasetyo, Teguh. (2020). Filsafat, Teori, & Ilmu Hukum: Pemikiran Menuju Masyarakat yang Berkeadilan dan Bermartabat. (Depok: RajaGrafindo, 2020).

Irawan, Candra. (2017) Hukum Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa di Indonesia, Edisi Revisi, Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (Ahsan Yunus (Ed.); 5th ed.). Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata

Nurhilmiyah, N. (2024). Konstruksi Hukum Pengenaan Bunga yang Berkeadilan pada Pinjaman Online (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Sumatera Utara).

Rasyid, Abdul.(2018)."Penyebab Terjadinya Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah", melalui https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/08/09/penyebab-terjadinya-sengketa-ekonomi-syariah/

Santoso, Aris Prio Agus; et.al. (2024). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press.

Suadi, Amran. (2022). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Kencana..

Wajdi, Farid, et al. (2023). Hukum Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis, ed. Variza Octifanny Rahmadianti, Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (UU APS)




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.23768

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.23768.g13087

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.