DIGITAL DEBT AS‘SELF-REWARD: RECONCILING GEN Z’S PAYLATER CONSUMPTION WITH ISLAMIC FINANCIAL ETHICH

Khairin Al Qisti

Abstract


This study explores digital debt practices among Generation Z by framing paylater consumption as a form of self-reward in the digital economy and examining its compatibility with Islamic financial ethics. The ease of access, instant gratification, and lifestyle-oriented marketing of paylater services encourage Gen Z to normalize deferred payments as part of everyday consumption. While such mechanisms provide short-term satisfaction and perceived financial flexibility, they also pose ethical challenges related to debt accumulation, self-control, and moral responsibility. From the perspective of Islamic finance, consumption is expected to be guided by principles of balance (wasatiyyah), responsibility, and the avoidance of exploitative financial elements. This study employs a normative and conceptual analysis to assess whether paylater practices can be ethically justified when aligned with Islamic values. The analysis indicates that digital debt may be tolerated as a conditional financial instrument when it avoids usury, ensures transparency, and supports genuine needs rather than impulsive desires. Ultimately, the study emphasizes the importance of integrating Islamic financial ethics with digital consumer behavior to promote sustainable and morally grounded financial practices among Generation Z.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arisandy, D., & Hurriyati, R. (2021). Consumer self-reward behavior in digital consumption: Psychological perspectives on impulsive buying. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 20(4), 987–999.

Bauman, Z. (2007). Consuming life. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Belk, R. W. (2013). Extended self in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139–168.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Chapra, M. U. (2000). The future of economics: An Islamic perspective. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Deloitte. (2022). Global Gen Z and Millennial Survey: Living and working with purpose in a transforming world. Deloitte Insights.

El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huda, N., & Santoso, B. (2020). Digital finance and Islamic ethics: Challenges and opportunities for Muslim consumers. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 6(3), 563– 584.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2014). The economic importance of financial literacy: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature, 52(1), 5–44.

Mick, D. G., & DeMoss, M. (1990). Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 322–332.

OECD. (2021). OECD/INFE international survey of adult financial literacy. OECD Publishing.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Qardhawi, Y. (1997). The lawful and the prohibited in Islam. Cairo: Al-Falah Foundation.

Ritzer, G. (2015). The McDonaldization of society (8th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Suryono, R. R., Budi, I., & Purwandari, B. (2020). Challenges and trends of financial technology (FinTech): A systematic literature review. Information, 11(12), 590.

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. New York: Atria Books.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism. New York: PublicAffairs.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.29342

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.29342.g14901

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.