DIGITAL RESILIENCE IN ISLAMIC COMMUNICATION: LINGUISTIC STRATEGIES FOR CROSS-CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING IN THE POST-DIGITAL ERA

Faustyna Faustyna

Abstract


In the post-digital era, this study highlights how Islamic communicators are using linguistic strategies to build digital resilience and cross-cultural understanding in multicultural and multilingual communication spaces. This research explores the integration of Islamic communication, linguistic agility, and media literacy to create effective and ethical digital religious messages. Qualitative content analysis to examine online sermons, multilingual da'wah videos, and posts by prominent Islamic influencers. The theoretical framework refers to Digital Resilience Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, and Framing Theory, which collectively guide linguistic adaptation analysis and cultural negotiation. The findings reveal that Islamic communicators use strategies such as code switching, metaphorical framing, inclusive language, and multilingual outreach to maintain theological authenticity while improving accessibility. This method contributes to digital resilience by protecting the message of Islam from misinterpretation, misinformation, and extremism. The study concludes that effective Islamic communication in the post-digital era depends on a balanced synthesis of religious-based principles with advanced linguistic and digital competencies. This study recommends structured media literacy training for Islamic preachers and content creators, as well as the development of cross-cultural communication frameworks to navigate global discourse ethically. The importance of a strong and inclusive Islamic message in promoting peace, understanding, and unity in the digital world.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Grading in digital inclusion: Children, adolescents, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.

Brigden, N. K., & Mainwaring, A. (2020). Digital resilience: A tool to survive surveillance capitalism. Surveillance & Society, 18(1), 105–112.

Hassan, R. (2010). Islamic Communication in the Era of Global Media: Ethical Challenges. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 3(2-3), 121–136.

Hamad, MM (2019). Islamic values and their impact on communication behavior. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 15(1), 45–54.

Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural Consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across countries. Sage Publications.

Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L.C. (2012). Understanding Intercultural Communication (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: A Critical Study of Language. Long man.

Gee, J.P. (2014). Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Methods. Routledge.

Cramer, F. (2015). What is "post-digital"? In A. Berry & J. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computing and Design (pp. 12-26). Palgrave Macmillan.

Jandrić, P., Knox, J., & Sinclair, C. (2022). Post-Digital Research: Genealogy, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Springer.

Campbell, HA (2020). Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practices in Digital Media. Routledge.

Brigden, N. K., & Mainwaring, A. (2020). Digital resilience: A tool to survive surveillance capitalism. Surveillance & Society, 18(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i1.13545

Campbell, HA (2020). Digital religion: Understanding religious practices in digital media (2nd edition). Routledge.

Cramer, F. (2015). What is "post-digital"? In A. Berry & J. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computing and design (pp. 12–26). Palgrave Macmillan.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: A critical study of language. Long man.

Gee, J.P. (2014). Introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and methods (4th edition). Routledge.

Hamad, MM (2019). Islamic values and their impact on communication behavior. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 15(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.15.2019.005

Hassan, R. (2010). Islamic Communication in the Era of Global Media: Ethical Challenges. Journal of Arab & Muslim Media Research, 3(2–3), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.3.2-3.121_1

Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultural consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across countries (2nd edition). Sage Publications.

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Grading in digital inclusion: Children, adolescents, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

Ting-Toomey, S., & Chung, L.C. (2012). Understanding intercultural communication (2nd edition). Oxford University Press.

Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Grading in digital inclusion: Children, adolescents, and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671696.https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807080335

Brigden, N. K., & Mainwaring, A. (2020) Digital resilience: Tools to survive surveillance capitalism. Surveillance & Society, 18(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i1.13545




DOI: https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.29414

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.3059/insis.v0i0.29414.g14854

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.