THE EXISTENCE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISIONS IN THE HIERARCHIES OF LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA

Geofani Milthree Saragih

Abstract


The Constitutional Court is one of the state institutions in Indonesia that exists within the jurisdiction of the judiciary. The main background for the birth of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia is the result of a change from an authoritarian government system to a democratic one. The existence of the Constitutional Court is expected to provide significant restrictions on the formation of laws in Indonesia which are considered to be tools that are misused by certain oligarchs in fulfilling the interests of their groups. As was the conclusion of Mahfud MD's dissertation which said that basically politics determines law. The discussion in this chapter will examine the existence of the Constitutional Court's decision in terms of reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia. Broadly speaking, the discussion will be divided into three sub-chapters, first , regarding the background of the birth of the Constitutional Court in Indonesia and the powers it has, second , the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia, third , the existence of the Constitutional Court's decision in reviewing laws against laws Basic 1945 in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia. The main conclusion from the discussion of this sub-chapter is to emphasize that basically the decision of the Constitutional Court greatly influences the existence of a law that is being enacted, because the Constitutional Court can negate a law that is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution. This fact can affect other legal products contained in the hierarchy of laws and regulations in Indonesia, especially those under the law and which have the same status as the law, namely government regulations in lieu of laws.


Full Text:

PDF

References


AF, A. Abid Ulil Albab. “Problem Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Memutus Perselisihan Hasil Pilkada.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan 48, No. 3 (2018).

Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Tertib Jenis, Hierarki, Dan Materi Muatan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan: Permasalahan Dan Solusinya.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 47, No. 1 (January 30, 2018): 1.

Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. “Kewenangan Pembubaran Partai Politik Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM).” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 7, no. 3 (2014).

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: PT. Bhuana Ilmu Komputer, 2007.

Fadjar, Abdul Mukhtie. Hukum Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2006.

Fatkhurohman (last), Dian Aminudin, and Sirajuddin. Memahami Keberadaan Mahkamah Konstitusi Di Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.

Geofani Milthree Saragih. “Kajian Filosofis Terhadap Pemberlakuan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dari Perspektif Teori Jhon Austin Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU/XVII/2020.” JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL 1, no. 4 (November 7, 2022): 28–41.

Gutom, Lodewijk. Eksistensi Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Utomo, 2007.

Huda, Ni’Matul. Sengketa Kewenangan Lembaga Negara (Dalam Teori Dan Praktik Di Mahkamah Konstitusi). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Lailam, Tanto. “Analisis Praktik Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945.” Jurnal Pranata Hukum 6, no. 2 (2011).

Mas, Marwan. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2017.

MD, Moh. Mahfud. Konstitusi Dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2012.

Mohammad Fajrul. Pertumbuhan Dan Model Konstitusi Serta Perubahan UUD 1945 Oleh Presiden, DPR Dan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2014.

Natabaya, Ahmad Syarifuddin. Sistem Peraturan Perundang-undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Jendral Mahkamah Konstitusi, 2006.

Rishan, Idul. “Konsep Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18, no. 1 (May 27, 2021): 001–021.

Rosidi, and Ahmad. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Rinjani 6, no. 2 (2018).

Saragih, Geofani Milthree. “Kewenangan Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 85/Puu-Xx/2022.” Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia 2, No. 2 (2022).

———. “Pancasila Sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia.” Jupank ( Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan) 2, No. 12 (2022).

———. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang Terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Oleh Lembaga Negara Di Indonesia.” Skripsi, Universitas Riau, N.D. Https://Scholar.Google.Com/Citations?View_Op=View_Citation&Hl=Id&User=0hzqiwqaaaaj&Citation_For_View=0hzqiwqaaaaj:Rolk4nbrz8uc.

Siahaan, Maruarar. Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2015.

———. “Integrasi Konstitusional Kewenangan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 4 (January 25, 2021): 729–752.

Sulaiman, King Faisal. Politik Hukum Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2017.

Susanti, Bivitri. “Menyoal Jenis dan Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia” 1, no. 2 (2017).

Syaifulloh, Putra Perdana Ahmad. “Kewajiban Partai Politik Berideologi Pancasila Ditinjau dari Prinsip-Prinsip Negara Hukum Indonesia.” Jurnal Pandecta 11, no. 2 (2016).

Thontowi, Jawahir. Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Hukum (Pandangan Terhadap Ancaman “The Lost Generation”). Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2016.

Widarto, Joko. “Konstitusionalitas Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Pemilihan Umum Kepala Daerah.” Lex Jurnalica 11, no. 2 (2014).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v4i1.14946

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.