ANALYSIS OF THE FUNCTION OF THE PROSPERITY'S COMMISSION IN SUPERVISING THE BEHAVIOR OF PROSPECTORS IN INDONESIA

Muhammad Fachrur Rozi

Abstract


With the power possessed by the Attorney General of the Republic of Indonesia, this institution has considerable powers in the field of prosecution and in administering state power. To minimize the occurrence of the Authority of State Power that exceeds the limit, usually, every State Institution must have limits through the Internal and External Oversight Board. It becomes a problem/issue when the external oversight agency, in this case, is the KKRI, where the results of the oversight carried out by the agency are in the form of recommendations, not followed up by the Attorney General or the President. The purpose of this study is to know the Authority of the Prosecutor's Commission and the legal consequences that arise in carrying out its duties and functions. The research method used is normative juridical. The results of this study are that the Prosecutor's Commission in Supervision has the authority to provide recommendations on alleged violations of ethics or the Prosecutor's behavior, but these recommendations do not have coercive power to be carried out like the form of supervision carried out by the Ombudsman which has juridical consequences if not implemented in the form of administrative to criminal sanctions, so it is necessary to strengthen normatively by providing legal consequences if the recommendation is not implemented by the Attorney General or the President.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu. Jakarta, Sinar Graphic, 2015.

Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia, Jakarta, Constitutional Court in collaboration with the Center for Constitutional Law Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia. 2003.

Choky R. Ramadhan, Position, Tugas dan Kewenangan Komisi Kejaksaan. Media Hukum dan Keadilan teropong, Volume 1 November 2013.

Efendi, Sultan Fadhilah, Penguatan Rekomendasi Komisi Kejaksaan dalam Pengawasan Pelanggaran Etik Jaksa, Jurnal Legislatif, Vol.4 No. June 2, 2021.

Eka NAM Sihombing, Cynthia Hadita, Penelitian Hukum (Malang: Setara Press, 2022).

Eka N.A.M. Sihombing and Cynthia Hadita, “Bentuk Ideal Tindak Lanjut Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang,” Japhtn-Han 1, no. 1 (2022): 35–46.

Eka NAM Sihombing, Dani Sintara, Cynthia Hadita, “Limitations Of Revision The Legislations In The Process Of Formulating The Legislations In Indonesia”, Nomoi Law Review, 3, No. November (2022): 116–124.

Hani, Handoko. Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: PT Rafika Aditam, 1999.

Husen, A. Eksistensi Peraturan Presiden Dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang Undangan”,Lex Scientia Law Review. 3(1): 2019.

Marilang, Menimbang Paradigma Keadilan Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Konstitusi. 14 (2). 2017.

MD, Moh. Mahfud. Constitution and Law in Controversial Issues. Jakarta, Rajawali Press, 2012.

National Law Commission and Indonesian Judicial Monitoring Society, Attorney Renewal: Formation of Minimum Prosecutor Profession Standards, KHN and MaPPI, Jakarta: 2004.

Nurtjahjo, H. (2005). Nurtjahjo,H. Lembaga, Badan dan Komisi Negara Independen (State Auxilliary Agencies) Di Indonesia : Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan. 35( 3). 2005.

Prosperous, Efektivitas Kebijakan Pengawasan. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama, 2011.

Syafiq, M & Ichsan Muhajir. Model Pengawasan Yang Efektif Terhadap Kinerja Kejaksaan Dalam Proses Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Spektrum Hukum. (2019.

Syarifah, Nur. Meninjau Efektivitas Kewenangan Komisi Kejaksaan. Media Hukum dan Keadilan teropong, Volume 1 November 2013.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v4i1.14948

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.