RECONSTRUCTION OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT REGARDING THE DETERMINATION OF APPLICATIONS POSITIVE FICTION ( Analysis Critical Post The Birth Constitution Number 6 of 2023 concerning Determination Regulation Government Replacement Constitution Number 2 of 2022 concerning Create Work )

Cynthia Hadita

Abstract


The problem the disappearance authority State Administrative Court in set application submission fictitious positive Post The Birth Constitution Number 6 of 2023 concerning Determination Regulation Government Replacement Constitution Number 2 of 2022 concerning Create Work (UUCK) is necessary done reconstruction and carried out arrangement more carry on in Regulation Government or Regulation President . Method research used that is legal normative with approach critical legal studies . Research result show that if attitude silent official government considered granted then the Fictitious Decision Positive post UUCK will direct implemented by officials government That Alone without need submit application to PTUN matter This impressed deviate judicial power in set application fictitious positive that must be obeyed by Officials Government .


Full Text:

PDF

References


Andika Risqi Irvansyah. “Kedudukan Hukum Keputusan Fiktif Positif Sejak Pengundangan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Japhtn-Han 1, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.55292/japhtnhan.v1i2.31.

Barkatullah, Abdul Halim. Buku Ajar Filsafat Hukum. Bandung: Nusa Media, 2017.

Dani, Umar. “Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity of Jurisdiction Atau Duality of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya / Understanding Administrative Court in Indonesia: Unity of Jurisdiction or Duality of Jurisdiction System? A Study of Hierarchy and Characteristic.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 7, no. 3 (2018): 405. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.405-424.

Hadita, Eka N.A.M Sihombing dan Cynthia. “Analisis Wacana Hukuman Pancung Di Provinsi Aceh.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 6, no. 4 (2019).

Hadita, Eka NAM Sihombing dan Cynthia. Penelitian Hukum. Malang: Setara Press, 2022.

HR, Ridwan. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: UII Press Indonesia, 2002.

Pattipawae, Dezonda Rosiana. “Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Era Otonomi.” Jurnal Sasi 1, no. 2019 (25AD): 96.

Pratama, Surya Mukti. “Pengaturan Baru Keputusan Fiktif Positif Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kompetensi PTUN.” Jurnal RECHTSVINDING, no. November (2020): 1–4.

Reza, Farah Syah. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Makassar: Sosial Politic Genius (Sign), 2018.

Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2006.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. “Prospek Prinsip Fiktif Positif Dalam Menunjang Kemudahan Berusaha Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rechtsvinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 7, no. 2 (2018): 112.

Sudarsono, Rabbenstain Izroiel. Petunjuk Praktis Beracara Di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Konvensional Dan Elektronik. Jakarta: Kencana, 2019.

Titik Triwulan, Ismu Gunadi Widodo. Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Dan Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana, n.d.

Triartha Yuliani, Erlin. “Perbandingan Antara Konsep Fiktif Negatif Dalam Uu 5 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Dengan Konsep Fiktif Positif Dalam Uu 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6, no. 1 (2020): 64.

Untoro. “Self-Resfect Dan Kesadaran Hukum Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Menuju Keadilan.” Jurnal Pandecta 13, no. 1 (2019): 38.

Wulandari, Desy. “Pengujian Keputusan Fiktif Positif Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 1 (2020): 32–56. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss1.art3.

Zulkarnaen, dan Dewi Mayaningsih. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia. Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia, 2018.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v5i2.21521

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.