Blended Learning in Counseling Laboratory Techniques (CLT) Courses: Student Perceptions About the Effectiveness of Learning

Muhammad Putra Dinata Saragi, Abdurrahman Abdurrahman, Rina Suryani


The learning system regularly undergoes changes that require instructors and learners to utilize electronic media and online networks to carry out the learning process, with the hope that learning can be more productive. This study aims to analyze students' perceptions of learning that combine conventional methods and online methods, as well as see their effectiveness in laboratory-based courses. This study used 165 students as a sample and 15 students as participants for semi-structured interviews. Data were collected using a closed questionnaire that has been tested for validity and reliability and interviews. The research findings show that students' perceptions of blended learning in the effective category and active blended learning contribute to students in learning. The findings of this study can be input in improving the quality of learning in higher education and improving graduate achievement


Blended Learning, Counseling Laboratory Techniques, Perceptions

Full Text:



Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: Challenges and perspectives. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 49–59.

Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-qatawneh, S. S. (2019). Heliyon The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(May), e02424.

Asri, M. (2017). Dinamika Kurikulum di Indonesia. 4(September), 192–202.

Bervell, B., & Umar, I. N. (2018). Blended learning or face-to-face? Does Tutor anxiety prevent the adoption of Learning Management Systems for distance education in Ghana? Open Learning, 00(00), 1–19.

Bustamam, N. (2016). Keterampilan Dasar Konseling: Laporan Tes dan Langkah Berikutnya. Suloh, 1(1), 27–35.

Carbonell, K. B., Dailey-Hebert, A., Gerken, M., & Grohnert, T. (2013). Problem-based learning in hybrid, blended, or online courses: Instructional and change management implications for supporting learner engagement. In Cutting-Edge Technologies in Higher Education (Vol. 6, Issue PARTG). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research : Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Dolmans, D. H. J. M., De Grave, W., Wolfhagen, I. H. A. P., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2005). Problem-based learning: Future challenges for educational practice and research. Medical Education, 39(7), 732–741.

Dos, B. (2014). Developing and evaluating a blended learning course. Anthropologist, 17(1), 121–128.

Fearon, C., Starr, S., & McLaughlin, H. (2011). Value of blended learning in university and the workplace: Some experiences of university students. Industrial and Commercial Training, 43(7), 446–450.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105.

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher Education-framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Janesick, V. J. (2015). Peer Debriefing. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, 2–3.

Jean, B. (2004). Counselling Skills in Context. In S. Aldridge & S. Riggby (Eds.), Counselling Skills in Context (pp. 85–107). Hodder & Stoughton.

Koúar, G. (2016). A Study of EFL Instructors’ Perceptions of Blended Learning. 232(April), 736–744.

Lothridge, K., Fox, J., & Fynan, E. (2013). Blended learning: Efficient, timely and cost effective. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(4), 407–416.

Mitchell, A., & Honore, S. (2007). Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3), 143–149.

Nugrahadi, E. W., Maipita, I., Ane, L., & Putra, P. D. (2018). Analisis Implementasi Kurikulum Berbasis Kkni Di Fakultas Ekonomi Unimed. Niagawan, 7(1), 8–13.

Poon, J. (2014). A cross-country comparison on the use of blended learning in property education. Property Management, 32(2), 154–175.

Seden, J. (2005). Counselling Skills in Social Work Practice. Open University Press.

Siagian, B. A., & Siregar, G. N. S. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Kurikulum Berbasis Kkni Di Universitas Negeri Medan. Pedagogia, 16(3), 327.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning : How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning. Kogan Page.

Tselios, N., Daskalakis, S., & Papadopoulou, M. (2011). Assessing the acceptance of a blended learning university course. Educational Technology and Society, 14(2), 224–235.

Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1–12.

Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 0(0), 1–27.

Wilson, D., & Smilanich, E. (2005). The Other Blended Learning: A Classroom-Centered Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Wong, L., Tatnall, A., & Burgess, S. (2014). A framework for investigating blended learning effectiveness. Education and Training, 56(2), 233–251.

Wu, J. H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers and Education, 55(1), 155–164.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Biblio Couns Stats