Post-Publication Discussion Policy

The Jurnal Intervensi Sosial dan Pembangunan (JISP) recognizes that scholarly communication is an ongoing process that extends beyond the publication of an article. Post-publication discussion provides an opportunity for readers, researchers, authors, and members of the academic community to engage in constructive dialogue, raise questions, provide critical feedback, and contribute additional perspectives on published research.

JISP encourages responsible, evidence-based, and constructive academic discussions to promote the continuous development of knowledge, strengthen research quality, and maintain the integrity of the scholarly record.

1. Scope of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussions may address various aspects of published articles, including but not limited to:

  • Theoretical perspectives, conceptual frameworks, and research contributions.

  • Research methodology, data analysis, and interpretation of findings.

  • The validity, reliability, and reproducibility of research results.

  • The relevance and implications of research findings for social intervention, social welfare, and development practices.

  • Potential methodological limitations, overlooked evidence, or alternative interpretations.

  • Issues concerning research integrity, publication ethics, and the accuracy of published information.

2. Submission of Comments and Responses

Readers and researchers who wish to provide comments or raise concerns regarding published articles may submit their contributions to the JISP Editorial Office through the journal's official communication channels.

Submissions should:

  • Clearly identify the published article being discussed, including its title, author(s), volume, issue, and DOI, where available.

  • Present arguments, observations, or criticisms in a clear, objective, and academically appropriate manner.

  • Be supported by relevant evidence, scholarly references, or methodological explanations where applicable.

  • Avoid personal attacks, discriminatory language, defamatory statements, or other forms of inappropriate communication.

Authors of the original articles may be invited to respond to comments or criticisms concerning their published work. The journal encourages a balanced exchange of perspectives between contributors and original authors.

3. Editorial Review and Assessment

All submissions intended for post-publication discussion are subject to editorial assessment before publication.

The editorial team will evaluate submissions based on their academic relevance, scholarly contribution, factual accuracy, clarity of argument, and compliance with the journal's publication ethics policies.

Where necessary, the Editor-in-Chief may seek advice from independent experts or relevant specialists to assess the scientific validity of the comments or responses.

The journal reserves the right to request revisions, decline submissions that do not meet its standards, or take other appropriate editorial actions.

4. Publication of Comments and Author Responses

Accepted comments and responses may be published on the journal's official website or through other appropriate scholarly communication formats, subject to editorial approval.

Where appropriate, the journal may provide links between the original article and the corresponding post-publication comments or responses to facilitate academic discussion and ensure accessibility for readers.

The publication of comments or responses does not automatically imply that the journal endorses the opinions expressed by individual contributors. Authors remain responsible for the content and arguments presented in their submissions.

5. Handling of Errors and Research Integrity Concerns

If post-publication discussions identify potential errors, inaccuracies, or concerns regarding the integrity of a published article, the editorial team will assess the matter in accordance with the journal's publication ethics policies.

Depending on the nature and significance of the issue, the journal may:

  • Request clarification or additional information from the original author(s).

  • Publish a correction or clarification where appropriate.

  • Publish an expression of concern if substantial questions remain unresolved.

  • Initiate a retraction process if serious violations of research integrity or publication ethics are established.

All actions will be undertaken fairly, objectively, and in accordance with applicable publication ethics standards.

6. Ethical Standards and Responsibilities

All participants in post-publication discussions are expected to uphold academic integrity, professional conduct, mutual respect, and responsible scholarly communication.

The journal does not tolerate harassment, personal attacks, intimidation, discriminatory remarks, or deliberate dissemination of misleading information through post-publication discussions.

The editorial team is responsible for ensuring that discussions are conducted in a fair, transparent, and academically constructive manner while safeguarding the rights and reputations of all parties involved.

7. Commitment to Scholarly Dialogue

The Jurnal Intervensi Sosial dan Pembangunan (JISP) is committed to fostering an open and constructive academic environment in which published research can be critically examined, discussed, and further developed.

Through this policy, JISP seeks to strengthen scholarly engagement, encourage intellectual exchange, and contribute to the continuous improvement of research quality and the advancement of knowledge in the fields of social intervention and development.