Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) aims to open the minds of writers consisting of teachers, lecturers, students and the community in making scientific works that can be produced from mini research or large-scale research both at the national and international levels. The focus of this Journal is: innovative works related to the development of learning media, the development of learning processes and the analysis of difficulties in learning and the application of e-learning that can effectively contribute positively to schools and higher education institutions, as well as the community services including the problems related to human relations, human development and social issues. 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Full Paper

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article submitted to the Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) needs to go through a three-step review process:


Step One:
The editor conducts an initial plagiarism check by Turnitin. Manuscripts with a similarity of 20% and above will automatically be rejected. While plagiarism-free manuscripts or similarities below or equal to 20% will proceed to the research design examination stage. Manuscripts that present a good research design will be directly preceded to the peer-review stage. Meanwhile, manuscripts that do not present a good research design will be rejected immediately.

Step Two:
The editor distributes the manuscripts to the reviewers. The Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) uses Double-Blind Peer Review. Therefore, before sending to the reviewers, the editor removes the author's identity, such as name, email, and affiliation. Reviewers check the content of the manuscript using the review form provided on the journal website through a special login for reviewers. They provide recommendations on the results of the manuscript to the editor in the type of decision, whether the manuscript is accepted, revised, or rejected, which must be accompanied by the reasons.

Step Three:
The editor sends the results of the reviewer's review to the author. If the manuscript has to be revised, but the author does not revise and provide a response, the manuscript will be rejected. On the other hand, if the manuscript is accepted, the authors must be willing for their article to proceed to the final proofreading stage. If the revised manuscript still contains major revisions, it will be returned to the reviewer; if it contains minor revisions, the editor will check and decide on the final decision. For each decision made, authors are entitled to a clear rationalization.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...