Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) aims to open the minds of writers consisting of teachers, lecturers, students and the community in making scientific works that can be produced from mini research or large-scale research both at the national and international levels. The focus of this Journal is: innovative works related to the development of learning media, the development of learning processes and the analysis of difficulties in learning and the application of e-learning that can effectively contribute positively to schools and higher education institutions, as well as the community services including the problems related to human relations, human development and social issues. 


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Full Paper

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Every article submitted to the Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) needs to go through a three-step review process:

Step One:
The editor conducts an initial plagiarism check by Turnitin. Manuscripts with a similarity of 25% and above will automatically be rejected. While plagiarism-free manuscripts or similarities below or equal to 25% will proceed to the research design examination stage. Manuscripts that present a good research design will be directly preceded to the peer-review stage. Meanwhile, manuscripts that do not present a good research design will be rejected immediately.

Step Two:
The editor distributes the manuscripts to the reviewers. The Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP) uses Double-Blind Peer Review. Therefore, before sending to the reviewers, the editor removes the author's identity, such as name, email, and affiliation. Reviewers check the content of the manuscript using the review form provided on the journal website through a special login for reviewers. They provide recommendations on the results of the manuscript to the editor in the type of decision, whether the manuscript is accepted, revised, or rejected, which must be accompanied by the reasons.

Step Three:
The editor sends the results of the reviewer's review to the author. If the manuscript has to be revised, but the author does not revise and provide a response, the manuscript will be rejected. On the other hand, if the manuscript is accepted, the authors must be willing for their article to proceed to the final proofreading stage. If the revised manuscript still contains major revisions, it will be returned to the reviewer; if it contains minor revisions, the editor will check and decide on the final decision. For each decision made, authors are entitled to a clear rationalization.


Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.



This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...


Publication Ethics

Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran follows the guidelines set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE-) in all matters relating to publication ethics, particularly in research and publication error protocols. JPPP adapts COPE to meet high ethical standards aimed at editors, writers, and peer review. The publisher has no right to interfere with the integrity of the content of the article and is only responsible for periodic and proper time publication.

For Editor

  1. The Editor is responsible for every manuscript published in the Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP).
  2. The Editor must ensure that the author follows the writing procedures in the Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JPPP).
  3. The Editor can communicate with the Journal Manager, other Editors, and Peer Review in making the Final Decision.
  4. The Editor must provide an objective evaluation of the manuscript without considering the aspects of citizenship, ethnicity, political affiliation, ethnic group, nation, religion, gender, seniority, or the author's institutional affiliation.
  5. Editors must decline assignments when there is a potential conflict of interest
  6. Editors must ensure that manuscripts sent to peer reviewers do not contain information about the author, and vice versa.
  7. The editor's decision must be submitted to the author accompanied by the reviewer's response, except for comments that are personal or defamatory.
  8. Editors should respect requests from authors who refuse the individuals to evaluate their manuscripts as long as the reasons are acceptable.
  9. If the Editor finds or suspects a violation in writing and authorship conflicts, editors can follow the guidelines in the COPE flowchart in dealing with authorship conflicts.
  10. Editors and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of all submitted manuscripts.

For Peer Review

  1. Peer reviews are asked to provide possible comments on research manuscripts if they suspect finding errors in writing procedures, publication ethics, and publishing.
  2. Peer reviews are expected to complete the work at a specified time and provide information to the Editor if they are unable to meet the specified deadline.
  3. Peer reviews must be able to keep the author's manuscript confidential.
  4. Peer reviews may not accept manuscripts for evaluation if there is a potential conflict of interest or competitive, collaborative, or other relationship with the author, company, or any institution.
  5. Peer reviews must ask the Editor for consideration/attention to the similarities in substance or overlaps between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers with the same author.
  6. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

For Author

  1. The author must be able to ensure that the manuscript has never been published before or has never transferred the rights of the article to another party.
  2. The author ensures the authenticity of the manuscript of the work and follows the rules of citation in accordance with the appropriate reference format.
  3. The author may not engage in plagiarism or auto plagiarism.
  4. The author must follow the procedures/rules for writing the JPPP that have been determined
  5. The author does not submit manuscripts simultaneously with the same topic and title to other journals.
  6. The author must be able to provide information and make details of related research data if the editor finds any suspicion of doubt or forgery, or plagiarism in the manuscript.
  7. If an author finds an error or inaccuracy that affects the submitted manuscript, the author must immediately notify the Editor or Journal manager to immediately withdraw the article and correct the manuscript.
  8. Authors are not allowed to withdraw articles that are being reviewed by the reviewer before being returned by the reviewer to the editor


Author Fee

The journal charges the following author fees.

Article Submission: 0.00 (IDR)
Authors are required to submit articles through the Website (OJS) of this Journal by Registering.

Article Publication: 350,000.- (IDR) or can contact the journal admin directly at number: 081945937110 (WA)

In the case of authors who unilaterally withdraw their article or cancel the publication of an article and who have subsequently paid the publication fee, the money will not be refunded.