Communication Symbols of Marriage in Minangkabaumanjapuik Marapulai Tradition on the Family-committed-relationship of Bayur Family in Medan

Beby Athiya

Abstract


This study aims to analyze intercultural communication for the Minangkabau community of nomads who are members of the Bayur Family Association in the implementation of the Manjapuik Marapulai tradition, as the proposal of marriage from the female side towards the male side along with bringing the gifts as a traditional symbol. The research used qualitative descriptive methods. Data collection was carried out by means of interviews and observations.The results showed that there are communication symbols in the Manjapuik Marapulai tradition, which describes that men remain leaders and rule, such as traditional figures or ninik mamak who speak and lead events, which is men. Manjapuik Marapulai has a special meaning because men are highly valued and believed to be responsible in the family. Manjapuik Marapulai has special requirements, such as carano or a place that contains betel leaves, gambier, betel nut and rarely added with tobacco or cigarettes. Carano is obliged at Manjapuik Marapulai event. The event will not be started without carano. Carano is a communication that describes consensus by means of deliberation. When the Manjapuik Marapulai event is about to begin, the two families consult using traditional rhymes or petitih then when the decision has been finalized the traditional figure or family representative will eat the betel as a sign of approval.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Amir. (2003). Adat Minangkabau, Pola, dan Tujuan Hidup Orang Minang. Jakarta: Mutiara Sumber Widya.

Athiya, B. (2019). Simbol-simbol Komunikasi Perkawinan Minangkabau dalam tradisi Manjampuik Marapulai pada Ikatan Keluarga Bayurdi Medan. UMSU.

Craig, T. R., & Muller, L. H. (2007). Theorizing Communication Readings Across. Los Angeles,: ge Publication.

Fortman, J., & Giles, H. (2006). Communicating Culture, dalam, Baldwin, J.R, Faulkner. New Jersy: Lawrence Eribaum.

Lubis, L. A., & Khasiah, Z. (2016). Komunikasi Simbolik dalam Upacara Pernikahan Manjapuik Marapulai di Nagari Paninjauan Sumatera Barat. Jurnal Komunikasi ASPIKOM , 2 (6), 396-409.

Lubis, L. A., & Zikra, K. (2014). Pemahaman Praktis Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Medan: USU Press.

Nasrullah, R. (2012). Komunikasi Antarbudaya di Era Budaya Siber. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nazir, M. (2005). Metode Penelitian. Bogor: Ghaila Indonesia.

Nugroho, E. (2019). Teoritis Komunikasi dalam Tradisi Sosiokultural. Communicology: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi , 7 (2), 236-253.

Polit, F. D., & Beck, T. C. (2005). International differences in nursing research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship , 44-53.

Putra, H. R. (2021). Strategi Komunikasi Politik Partai Aceh Dalam Menarik Simpati Masyarakat. PERSEPSI: Communication Journal , 4 (2), 180-192.

Siregar, N. M., & Lubis, A. (2019). Komunikasi Antarbudaya Etnis Rohingya dalam Upaya Eksistensi. Persepsi : Communication Journal , 2 (2), 70-78.

Yuliani, W. (2018). Metode Penelitian Deskriptif Kualitatif dalam Perspektif Bimbingan dan Konseling. Quanta , 2 (2), 83-91.

Zamroni, M. (2009). Filsafat Komunikasi; Pengantar Ontologis, Epistemologis, Aksiologis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Zulkarnaini. (2003). Minangkabau Ranah nan. Bukit Tinggi: Usaha Ikhlas.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/persepsi.v5i2.11105

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 


Persepsi: Communication Journal

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Kampus Pascasarjana
Jl. Denai No. 217 Medan 20226
Sumatera Utara-20238
E-mail: persepsi@umsu.ac.id