Decision of the Panel of Judges About Mafqud legacy (Study of Normative Juridical Analysis at the Medan City Religious Court)

Muhammad Yusuf, hafsah hafsah, Dhiauddin Tanjung

Abstract


This study aims to determine the method of the panel of judges of the Medan City Religious Court in taking law in mafqud inheritance cases, to find out the results of the decision of the panel of judges of the Medan City Religious Court in the case of mafqud inheritance, and to find out whether the decision of the panel of judges of the Medan City Religious Court in taking law in cases of mafqud inheritance is in accordance with the principles of justice and legal norms. This research method consists of several things: the type of research is empirical-juridical-normative, and the approach (approach) used is the statute approach, namely the decision approach of the Medan City Religious Court. Sources of data consist of observations, interview results, and results of documentation with Medan Religious Court Judges. The results of the research are as follows: The method of the panel of judges at the Medan City Religious Court in taking law in mafqud inheritance cases, which is almost the same as the methodology in other cases submitted to the Medan City Religious Court, is by following the formal legal rules and material law contained in the Code of Procedure Civil Code (KUHPerd.). The results of the decision of the panel of judges at the Medan City Religious Court in the mafqud inheritance case are that in four cases, three requests were granted, namely Determination Number 73/Pdt.P/2011/PA.Mdn., Determination Number 213/Pdt.P/2017/PA.Mdn., and Determination Number 68/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Mdn., while one case cannot be accepted, namely the lawsuit (contentious) in Decision Number 2317/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mdn. The decision of the panel of judges at the Medan City Religious Court in taking law in the mafqud inheritance case was in accordance with the principles of justice and legal norms; in general, it fulfilled the principles of justice. On the other hand, there were decisions of the assembly that were inconsistent with the principle of equality before the law (equality before the law), as in cases of lawsuits that were not granted by the judge for reasons that were not strong in the author's analysis. The standardization of statements concerning a person's mafqud, including both heirs and heirs. In cases of application (volunteer), it seems that it is very easy to determine who is mafqud, whereas in lawsuits (contentious), the judge is very thorough and very strict in examining someone who is mafqud. Besides that, there is a disregard for the rights of the heirs of the heir's siblings who are mafqud, which is contradictory with the principles of Islamic inheritance law

Keywords


Decision, panel of judges, mafqud inheritance, Medan City Religious Court

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. PT. Rineka Cipta.

Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (H.I.R) Reglemen Indonesia yang Diperbaharui (R.I.B.). (1941).

Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan. (2011). Keputusan Nomor 73/Pdt.P/2011/PA.Mdn. Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.

Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan. (2017a). Keputusan Nomor 213/Pdt.P/2017/PA.Mdn. Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.

Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan. (2017b). Keputusan Nomor 2317/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Mdn. Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.

Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan. (2018). Keputusan Nomor 68/Pdt.P/2018/PA.Mdn. Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.

Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Prenada Media Group.

Moeleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Offsete.

Nurlaelawati, E. (2012). Menuju Kesetaraan dalam Aturan Kewarisan Islam di Indonesia: Kedudukan Anak Perempuan VS Saudara Kandung, dalam Muchit A. Karim, Problematika Hukum Kewarisan Islam Kontemporer di Indonesia. Kementerian RI Badan Litbang dan Diklat Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan.

Pemerintah Pusat. (1974). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Pusat. (1975). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 9 Tahun 1975 tentang Pelaksanaan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan. Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.

Pemerintah Pusat. (1979). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1979 tentang Kesejahteraan Anak. Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Pusat. (1985). Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 1985 tentang Bea Materai. Departemen Hukum dan Ham.

Pemerintah Pusat. (2000). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 2000 tentang Perubahan Tarif Bea Materai dan Besarnya Batas Pengenaan Harga Nominal yang Dikenakan Bea Materai. Sekretariat Negara.

Pemerintah Pusat. (2006). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama. Sekretariat Negara.

Pengadilan Tinggi Agama. (1927). Reglemen Acara Hukum untuk Daerah Luar Jawa dan Madura (Reglement tot Regeling Van Het Rechtswezen in de Gewesten Buiten Java en Madura).

Raco, J. R. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Grasindo.

Soeharto. (1991). Instruksi Presiden Nomor 1 Tahun 1991 tentang Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Sekretariat Negara.

Subagyo, J. (2012). Metode Penelitian dalam Teori dan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.

Wawancara Pribadi Dengan Dra. A.N.P., M. W. H. , M. A. (2022). Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.

Wawancara Pribadi Dengan Drs. Naim, S. H. (2022). Hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v8i1.12481

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Address:

Faculty of Law,  University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara Jl. Kapten Mukhtar Basri No. 3 Medan, Kode Pos 20238

E-mail: delegalata@umsu.ac.id

Telp/HP/WA : 081262664567

DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is abstracting & indexing in the following databases: 

     

  Creative Commons License

De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter