Administrative Accountability of Public Officials for Criminal Acts of Corruption from the Perspective of State Administrative Law

Alpi Sahari

Abstract


Corruption is a social ill that undermines the people's welfare and hinders the implementation of national development. It also damages the image of a clean and dignified state apparatus, disregards morals, and damages the image and quality of people and the environment. Corruption in Indonesia has become widespread in all aspects of society. Corruption is considered to be widespread and is carried out by officials at various levels, including all levels of local government. Regulations related to corruption in Indonesia are contained in Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption. In addition, the Criminal Code also outlines regulations related to corruption. Administrative sanctions for corrupt public officials include dishonorable dismissal from office, revocation of pension and allowance rights, and a ban on holding public office for a certain period. These sanctions can be supplemented by other sanctions such as fines, compensation, or publication in the mass media if the sanctions are severe

Keywords


Accountability, Administrative, Public Officials, Corruption

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi Mansar, “The Efforts to Warn Corruption Through Education an Idiological Approach in Order Meet The Right to Country Rights”, Indonesian Journal of Education, Social Sciences and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 1, No. 2, June 2020.

Asor Olodaiv D B Siagian, Alpi Sahari, Ida Nadirah, “Juridical Analysis of Legal Sanctions for Criminal Acts of Corruption Conducted Together (Study of Supreme Court Decision Number 1054 K/Pid.Sus/2019)”, IJRS: International Journal Reglement & Society, Vol. 3 No. 3 Tahun 2022.

Benny Sumardiana, “Reversal Evidence Policy On Corruption As Specialization of Criminalization,” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies (IJCLS), Vol.2, November, 2017.

Chatrina Darul Rosikah dan Dessy Marliana Listianingsih. 2016. Pendidikan Antikorupsi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Horas Monang Jeffry Andi Gultom, Alpi Sahari, “Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi”, Jurnal Doktrin Review Magister Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 2 No. 1 Tahun 2023.

IGM. Nurdjana. 2010. Sistem Hukum Pidana dan Bahaya Laten Korupsi, Perspektif Tegaknya Keadilan Melawan Mafia Hukum,Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Lilik Mulyadi. 2000. Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Cetakan Pertama, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Philipus M. Hadjon dkk. 2011. Hukum Administrasi dan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, (Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press

Romli Atmasasmita. 1999. Prospek Penanggulangan Korupsi di Indonesia Memasuki Abad ke XXI: Suatu Reoreintasi atas Kebijakan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, (Bandung: Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar Madya dalam Ilmu Hukum pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjajaran.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v11i1.27130

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Address:

Faculty of Law,  University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara Jl. Kapten Mukhtar Basri No. 3 Medan, Kode Pos 20238

E-mail: delegalata@umsu.ac.id

Telp/HP/WA : 081262102097

DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is abstracting & indexing in the following databases: 

   Creative Commons License

De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter