DETERMINATION OF A SUSPECT AS A BANKRUPT DEBTOR WHO SOLD ASSETS BEFORE BEING DECLARED BANKRUPT (Analysis of Pretrial Decision Number 13/Pid Pra/2023/PN Mdn )

Jaka - Kelana; Sunarmi -; Wessy Trisna

doi:10.30596/nomoi.v7i1.30473

DETERMINATION OF A SUSPECT AS A BANKRUPT DEBTOR WHO SOLD ASSETS BEFORE BEING DECLARED BANKRUPT (Analysis of Pretrial Decision Number 13/Pid Pra/2023/PN Mdn )

Jaka - Kelana, Sunarmi -, Wessy Trisna

Abstract

The bankruptcy case of PT. Sarana Perdana Indoglobal (PT. SPI) is a reminder for business owners to refrain from committing criminal violations in their operations. PT. SPI was declared bankrupt due to its inability to pay its debts, or default, based on the decision of the Central Jakarta Commercial Court No. 20/ Pailit /2007/PN Niaga . Jkt Pst , dated May 18, 2007. Bankruptcy status the No become barrier sentenced to sanctions criminal to The commissioners, managers, and employees of PT. SPI were still subject to criminal penalties for carrying out company activities in violation of criminal law. The research method used in this study is normative. The results of the study state that the validity of the determination of a suspect against a legal subject is the standard of truth to assess whether or not the determination of a suspect against a legal subject is valid in accordance with the rules stated in the Indonesian criminal procedure law which is currently contained in the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code. The validity of the determination of a suspect against a bankrupt debtor is the standard of truth to assess whether or not the determination of a suspect against a bankrupt legal subject is valid in accordance with the rules stated in the Indonesian criminal procedure law which is currently contained in the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code. The judge who examined and tried the Pretrial Case Number 13 / PID PRA / 2023 / PN MDN, has carefully applied the law as it should be in accordance with the legal principles stipulated in the Constitutional Court Decision No. 21 / PUU-XII / 2014 and Article 1 number 14 of the 1981 Criminal Procedure Code. The decision has also properly applied the theory of legal protection.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Atika Ismail, “Analisis Alternatif Restrukturisasi Utang atau Penutupan Perusahaan Pada Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui PKPU, Kepailitan dan Likuidasi”, Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, Vol. 3 No.1 (2021),

Achmad Ali, Menguak Tabir Hukum (Suatu Kajian Filosofis dan Sosiologis), (Jakarta : Gunung Agung, 2002),

Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional,” Lembaga Peyitaan dan Pengelolaan Barang Hasil Kejahatan”, Jakarta: BPHN, 2013, hal.21 https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/laphir_lembaga_penyitaan_dan_pengelolaan_barang_hasil_kejahatan.pdf, diakses tanggal 21 Februari 2026.

Dian Latifiani, “Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Putusan Hakim”, Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Adhaper, Vol. 1, No. 1, Tahun 2015,

Dwika, “Keadilan dari Dimensi Sistem Hukum”, http://hukum.kompasiana.com. (02/04/2011), diakses pada 23 Februari 2026.

Eddy O.S. Hiariej, Topo Santoso, Anotasi KUHP Nasional, (Depok : Rajawali Pers, 2025),

Eka NAM Sihombing, Cynthia Hadita, Penelitian Hukum, Malang: Intrans Publishing, 2022.

Fence M. Wantu, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, (Gorontalo: UNG Press, 2015),

Harun M. Husein, Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Dalam Proses Pidana, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1991),

Johalden, Praperadilan dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana, (Serang, CV AA Rizky, 2021),

Keputusan Bersama Ketua Mahkamah Agung, Menteri Kehakiman, Jaksa Agung, dan Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Nomor : 08/KMA/1984, Nomor : M.02-KP.10.06 Th.1984, Nomor : KEP-076/J.A/3/1984, No Pol : KEP/04/III/1984 Tentang Peningkatan Koordinasi Dalam Penangan Perkara Pidana, Bab III Permasalahan.

Letezia Tobing, 29 November 2012, “Mengenai Asas Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis”, http://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/lt509fb7e13bd25/mengenai-asas-lex-specialis-derogat-legi-generalis, diakses tanggal 21 Februari 2026.

M. Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (Penyidikan dan Penuntutan) Edisi Kedua, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2007),

Himawan, 9 Mei 2018, “Nilai Tagihan Kreditur PKPU Abu Tours Capai Rp1 Triliun”, http://news.rakyatku.com/read/100477/2018/05/09/nilai-tagihan-kreditur-pkpu-abu-tours-capairp1-triliun, diakses tanggal 21 Februari 2026

Riduan Syahrani, Rangkuman Intisari Ilmu Hukum, (Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999),

Satjipto Rahardjo, Ilmu Hukum, (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2012)

Sapto Budoyo, “Konsep Langkah Sistemik Harmonisasi Hukum dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan”, Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS, Vol. 4 No. 2 Tahun 2014,

Siti Hapsah Isfardiyana, “Sita Umum Kepailitan Mendahului Sita Pidana dalam Pemberesan Harta Pailit”, Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 3, No. 3, Tahun 2016, hal. 644-655, http://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/pjih/article/viewFile/7177/5419, diakses tanggal 21 Februari 2026.

Shandy Herlian Frimansyah, Achmad Mifta Farid, “Politik Hukum Praperadilan sebagai Lembaga Perlindungan Hak Tersangka Ditinjau dari Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 mengenai Penetapan Tersangka”, Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 3, No. 2 (2022),

Sunarmi, Prinsip Keseimbangan Dalam Hukum Kepailitan di Indonesia Edisi 2, (Jakarta : PT. Sofmedia, 2010)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/nomoi.v7i1.30473

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.