Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Persepi: Communication Journal is a media publication manuscript that contains the results of the Field Research communication science applying peer-reviewed. Manuscripts published in the JPersepi: Communication Journal includes the results of scientific research original articles scientific reviews that are new, Persepi: Communication Journal accepts manuscripts in the field of research that covers scientific fields:

  • Communication scholarship
  • Journalism
  • Media research, and application
  • Political Communication
  • Public Relation
  • Social Media
  • Organizational Communication
  • Cultural Communication
  • Mass Communication and Broadcast Communication

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Persepi: Communication Journal  implement each accepted manuscript will go through a review process by the Editor and reviewers, using a Double blind Peer-Review Process, which the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author did not know the identity of the reviewer.

Persepi: Communication Journal  implement policies Double Blind Peer-Review, every manuscript received will be sent to Reviewers who registered in The Persepi: Communication Journal. The review process lasts a maximum of up to 30 (thirty) days with the allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete its review process is a maximum of ten (10) working days. If the partners designated bestari previously not able to finish his review work within the time limit specified then chairman of the Chairman of Editorial Board will appoint a replacement to do a review Reviewers manuscript.

In the review process, reviewers provide considerations relating to compatibility between the title, abstract, introduction, discussion (results) and conclusion. In addition reviewer also give consideration associated with novelty, scientific impact and references used

Review Process:

1. Author submit the manuscript
2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
3. Double-blind peer review process
4. Editor Decision (Acceptend Submission, Revisions Required, Resubmit For Review, Decline Submission)
5. Confirmation to the authors

Final decision of articles acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by Editor in Chief by considering sequence of accepted date and geographical distribution of authors.

EDITORIAL PROCESS







 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Plagiarism Check

All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin Software & Plagiarism Checker Sofware 

 

 

References Management

eferences to other publications must be in American Psychological Association (APA) style and carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency.

Use Reference Management by Mendeley, Zetero, EndNote, 

 

 DOWNLOAD MENDELEY GUIDELINES

 

Retraction

The papers published in the Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen dan Bisnis will be consider to retract in the publication if :

  1. They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error). 
  2. the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication)
  3. it constitutes plagiarism
  4. it reports unethical research

The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf



Alamat Redaksi :
Magister Ilmu Komunikasi Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Jl. Denai No 217 Medan Denai
Website : http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/persepsi