Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Al-Hisab: Journal of Islamic Astronomy (JAH) is a forum to communicate Islamic Astronomy progress in Indonesia. Overseas writers are welcome to submit their best articles to this journal. Al-Hisab: Journal Islamic Astronomy publishes review papers, and research papers with a focus on Islamic astronomy theoretical and empirical studies in the Instrumentation fields, General Astronomy, Sensors, manuscripts in Islamic Astronomy, Islamic Law, Instrumentation, and Observatory, that contribute to the advancement of Islamic astronomy and provides benefits to readers around the world.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Al-Hisab: Journal of Islamic Astronomy implements that every manuscript received will go through a review process by editors and reviewers, using a double-blind peer-review process. It makes sure that the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the author. Every manuscript received will be sent to reviewers registered in the Al-Hisab journal. The review process lasts a maximum of 30 (thirty) days with an allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete the review process a maximum of 10 (ten) working days. If the partner appointed by the previous reviewer cannot complete his review work within the specified time limit, the Editor in Chief will appoint a replacement of reviewer to review the manuscript.

In the review process, the reviewer provides considerations related to the suitability between the title, abstract, introduction, methods, result and discussion with the conclusion. In addition, the reviewer also gives consideration related to novelty, scientific impact, and references used.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethnics

Al-Hisab: Journal Islamic Astronomy follow the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE-) in all matters related to the ethics of publication., Al-Hisab: Journal Islamic Astronomy adapting to meet the highest standards of ethics intended for editors, writers, and Reviewer. Publisher does not have the right to interfere with the integrity of the paper and is only responsible for publishing regularly and on time.

FOR EDITOR

  1. Editor Party Must ensure that writers follow the procedures/rules of writing in the Al-Hisab: Journal Islamic Astronomy.
  2. The Editor can communicate with the Journal Manager, Editor, and Reviewer other in taking the Final Decision.
  3. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interest
  4. The Editor must provide manuscripts assess objectively without seeing aspects of nationality, ethnicity, political affiliation, ethnicity, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation author.
  5. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interes.
  6. Editors must ensure that the manuscript sent to reviewers do not contain information about the author, and vice versa.
  7. Decisions editors must be delivered to the author with responses Reviewer, except for responses that are personal or libelous.
  8. Editors should honor requests from writers who refuse individuals to evaluate manuscripts for reasons unacceptable.
  9. When the Editor finds or suspects Violation action writing and conflict authorship, editors can follow the guidelines in the flow diagram in resolving conflict COPE authorship.
  10. Editor and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of all the manuscripts received

FOR REVIEWER 

  1. Reviewers are asked to provide an assessment of the substance of the manuscript in accordance with the Focus and Scope Journal and provide recommendations on assessment.
  2. Reviewers are asked to provide comments on the manuscript, if it is suspected find procedural mistakes of writing, publishing and publishing ethics
  3. Mitra Bestari can complete work on at a predetermined time and provide information to the editor if they are unable to meet the time limit specified.
  4. Reviewers must be able to be confidential manuscripts Author.
  5.  Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for appraisal, if potential conflicts of interest, both individually and collaboratively with any institution.
  6. Reviewers should ask for consideration to the Editor on the similarity of substance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration or manuscript that was published more in common with Author Author or other.
  7. privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.

FOR AUTHORS

  1. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and not plagiarism.
  2. The author must ensure that the manuscript has not been published previously and have never been assigned the rights to the article to the other party.
  3. The author ensures that manuscript Send tends to the work itself and follow the standard rules in accordance with the format quoting the appropriate reference.
  4. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and does not engage in plagiarism or automatic plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism.
  5. Authors must follow the procedures established of Al-Hisab: Journal Islamic Astronomy.
  6. The author does not send the manuscript together with the same topic and title to another journal.
  7. Authors should be able to provide information and make research data related details when the editor discovered the alleged doubts or falsification or plagiarism in the manuscripts. If the author finds any errors or inaccuracies that affect the manuscript which has been sent, the writer must promptly notify the Editor to immediately withdraw the manuscript writing and repairing.
  8. The author is not allowed to withdraw the article being reviewed by the reviewer before being restored by a Reviewer to the Editor.