Review Of The Intellectual Property Directorate General's Responsibility Regarding The Cancellation Of Well-Known Trademark Registration In The Same Class Of Goods

Nasywa Laffaiza, Christine S.T Kansil

Abstract


The responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DJKI) in canceling the registration of famous trademarks in the same class of goods is an important issue in the protection of intellectual property rights in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze the authority of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property (DGIP) in canceling the registration of well-known trademarks that are deemed to harm the owners of well-known trademarks, especially when the newly registered trademark is in the same class of goods. This review examines the responsibilities and authorities of DJKI based on regulations governing trademark cancellation, such as Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, as well as decisions issued by DJKI related to trademark cancellation. This research also discusses the factors that influence DJKI's decisions in assessing whether a brand can be considered famous and whether the registration of a new brand can pose a risk of confusion in the market. The analysis results show that DJKI has a significant responsibility in maintaining the integrity of the trademark registration system and protecting the rights of famous trademark owners. This research provides recommendations on the importance of stricter supervision and law enforcement to ensure that famous brands are optimally protected from misuse and intellectual property rights violations in Indonesia

Keywords


Responsibility of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property, Cancellation of Trademark Registration, Famous Trademark, Class of Goods

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dharmawan. (2016). Buku ajar hak kekayaan intelektual. Deepublish.

Gunawati. (2015). Perlindungan merek terkenal barang dan jasa tidak sejenis terhadap persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Alumni.

Khotimah, & Apriani. (2022). Faktor-faktor penyebab terjadi pelanggaran hak merek berupa pemboncengan reputasi (passing off) merek terkenal ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 8(1), 65.

Maulana. (2000). Merek terkenal menurut TRIPs Agreement dan penerapan dalam sistem merek Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 3(1), 7.

Prasomya, & Santoso. (2022). Tinjauan yuridis pembatalan merek dagang terkait prinsip itikad baik dalam sistem pendaftaran merek. Jurnal Notarius, 2(1), 15.

Sudjana. (2020). Kepastian hukum dalam efektivitas perlindungan merek dan indikasi geografis: Analisis perbandingan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE’JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum, 5(1), 54.

Sujatmiko, A. (2018). Aspek yuridis lisensi merek dan persaingan usaha. Jurnal Hukum Pro Justitia, 3(2), 26.

Wala, & Firmansyah. (2024). Konsep restorative justice untuk mengurangi over capacity pada perkara pidana. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 12(2), 247




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/dll.v10i1.22274

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Address:

Faculty of Law,  University of Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara Jl. Kapten Mukhtar Basri No. 3 Medan, Kode Pos 20238

E-mail: delegalata@umsu.ac.id

Telp/HP/WA : 081262664567

DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is abstracting & indexing in the following databases: 

   Creative Commons License

De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Statcounter