.png){kind=logo}
1.png)
Analisis Komparatif terhadap Tingkat Pemahaman Peserta Didik Terhadap Proses Pembelajaran
Abstract
Abstract: This research aims to analyze and compare student understanding during the learning process at SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Utara and SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Selatan. The study used an observational qualitative approach to obtain an in-depth picture of the level of student understanding during the learning process. Data collection techniques were carried out through observation, interviews, and documentation. Data were analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model, which includes data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study indicate differences in student understanding at the two schools. These differences are influenced by variations in learning methods applied by teachers, the level of student involvement in learning activities, and the availability and utilization of learning facilities. The novelty of this study lies in the comparative analysis conducted through direct observation of student understanding in two different school contexts. The research findings are expected to serve as evaluation material and considerations for schools in improving the quality of the learning process and student understanding.
Keywords: Student Understanding, Learning Process, Comparative Study, Qualitative Research
Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan pemahaman peserta didik dalam proses pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Utara dan SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Selatan. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif observatif untuk memperoleh gambaran yang mendalam mengenai tingkat pemahaman peserta didik selama mengikuti pembelajaran. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan model Miles dan Huberman yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan pemahaman peserta didik pada kedua sekolah. Perbedaan tersebut dipengaruhi oleh variasi metode pembelajaran yang diterapkan guru, tingkat keterlibatan peserta didik dalam kegiatan belajar, serta ketersediaan dan pemanfaatan fasilitas pembelajaran. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komparatif yang dilakukan melalui observasi langsung terhadap pemahaman peserta didik pada dua konteks sekolah yang berbeda. Temuan penelitian diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan evaluasi dan pertimbangan bagi sekolah dalam meningkatkan kualitas proses pembelajaran serta pemahaman peserta didik.
Kata Kunci: Pemahaman Siswa, Proses Pembelajaran, Studi Perbandingan, Penelitian Kualitatif
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Amutia Sari, I., Hamuni, Syahrir, A., & Idrus, M. (2025). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Problem Solving Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Pancasila Siswa. Mores: Jurnal Pendidikan, Moral Dan Kewarganegaraan, 3(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.36709/MORES.V3I1.32
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans, Green and Co.
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24.
Budimansyah, D. (2010). Penguatan pendidikan kewarganegaraan untuk membangun karakter bangsa. Widya Aksara Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., Drummy, M., & Gardner, M. (2020). Education reimagined: The future of learning. New Pedagogies for Deep Learning.
Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 841–851. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201241
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson Education.
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2023). Laporan hasil asesmen nasional tahun 2023. Kemendikbudristek.
Lim, L., Johanson, M., & Sembiring, A. I. (2022). Metacognitive awareness and student learning outcomes in the digital learning environment. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 45–58.
Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Slavin, R. E. (2018). Educational psychology: Theory and practice (12th ed.). Pearson.
Sapriya. (2017). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan: Konsep dan pembelajaran. Alfabeta.
Suryadi, A. (2022). Pembelajaran bermakna sebagai strategi peningkatan kualitas pendidikan abad ke-21. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 11(2), 125–136.
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
Zhao, Y., Sullivan, A., & Mellenius, I. (2021). Active learning and student engagement: A systematic review of educational practices in higher education. Education Sciences, 11(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11100621
Creswell, J. W., & Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (6th ed.). Pearson.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/pcej.v5i1.30244
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Regina Pandia, Nova Purba, Ema Linda Lumban Gaol, Rohana Rohana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.