The Effect of Blended Learning Model with Moodle on the Students’ Writing Achievement

Muhammad Arifin


This study is an experimental research that aims to investigate the effect of the Blended Learning Model with Moodle on the students’ writing achievement. This research was conducted at SMK Tritech Informatika on Jalan Bhayangkara No. 484 Kecamatan Medan Tembung. The samples of the study were the eleventh-grade students of the first semester in the 2019/2020 academic year. There were two parallel classes, which each class consisted of 18 students. The researcher administered a pre-test and post-test about writing news item text to the students to obtain the data. Then, the researcher analyzed the data using a t-test to determine the effect of the model used. The result of the analysis shows that there was a difference in writing achievement between the students who were taught using Blended Learning Model and those who were taught using the conventional method. The value of the t-test proved it. the t-score was 3.12 and t-cv at the level of significance of 0.05 (1.690), which means that t-test (3.12) >t-cv (1.690). Based on the research finding, this study concludes that Blended Learning Model has a significant effect on the students' writing achievement.


students' achievement, the Blended Learning model, writing


Full Text:



Adas, D., & Bakir, A. (2013). Writing difficulties and new solutions: Blended learning as an approach to improving writing abilities. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(9), 254-266.

Adiwijaya, P. A., Purnami, N. A., & Arsana, I. S. (2019, August). Perception and obstacles of college students in writing. Yavana Bhāshā: Journal of English Language Education, 2(2), 1-11. doi:

Ahmad, N., & Al-Khanjari, Z. (2011). Effect of Moodle on learning: An Oman perception. International Journal of Digital Information and Wireless Communications (IJDIWC), 1(4), 746-752.

Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. doi:

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy. New York: Longman Publishing.

Bersin, J. (2004). The blended learning book. Best practices, proven methodologies, and lessons learned. San Fransisco: Pfeiffer.

Brown, H. D. (2000). The principle of language learning and teaching. San Fransisco: Longman.

Chourishi, D., Buttan, C. K., Chaurasia, A., & Soni, A. (2011). Effective e-learning through Moodle. International Journal of Advance Technology & Engineering Research (IJATER), 1(1), 34-38.

Cole, J. (2005). Using moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system. US: O'Reilly Media, Inc.

Costa, C., Alvelos, H., & Teixeira, L. (2012). The use of Moodle e-learning platform: a study in a Portuguese University. Procedia Technology, 5, 334-343. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2012.09.037

Dalle, J., Mutalibb, A. A., Saad, A. L., Ayub, M. N., Wahab, A. W., & Nasralla, A. M. (2015). Usability considerations make digital interactive book potential for inculcating interpersonal skills. Jurnal Teknologi, 77(29), 63–68. doi:10.11113/jt.v77.6837

Dalton-Puffer, C., Nikula, T., & Smit, U. (2010). Language use and language learning. In CLIL. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Dougiamas, M. (1998). A journey into constructivism. Retrieved from

Durga, V. S., & Rao, C. S. (2018). Developing students’ writing skills in English - A process approach. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 2, 1-5.

Dwiyogo, W. D. (2018). Blended learning-based instructional. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Escobar-Rodriguez, T., & Monge-Lozano, P. (2012). The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students. Computers & Education, 58, 1085–1093.

Facharzt, N. M., Abos, K. I., Algaidi, S., Heissam, K., & Zolaly, M. A. (2013). ‘Blended learning’ as an effective teaching and learning strategy in clinical medicine: a comparative cross-sectional university-based study. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 8(1), 12-17. doi:

Firmender, J. M., Gavin, M. K., & McCoach, D. B. (2014). Examining the relationship between teachers’ instructional practices and students' mathematics achievement. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 214-236. doi:

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 95-105. doi:

Graham, C. R., Henrie, C. R., & Gibbons, A. S. (2014). Developing models and theory for Blended learning research. In A. G. Picciano, C. D. Dziuban, & C. R. Graham, Blended learning: Research perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 13-33). New York: Routledge.

Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596 – 4603. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992

Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). The scope of writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 8, 5-16. doi:10.1016/S1075-2935(02)00029-6

Hancock, C. R. (1994). Alternative Assessment and Second Language Study What and Why? Retrieved from EricDigest: www.eric.ed.govED376695 1994-07-00

Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. New York: Pearson Education Limited.

Heaton, J. B. (1975). Writing English language test. London: Longman.

Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (2001). School achievement: Cognitive and motivational determinants. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 13552-13556). Pergamon. doi:

Hisham, D., Che Su, M., & Hasan, A. B. (2006). Moving forward with blended learning (BL) as a pedagogical alternative to traditional classroom learning. Malaysian Online Journal of Instructional Technology (MOJIT), 3(1), 11-18.

Hubackova, S., & Semradova, I. (2016). Evaluation of Blended Learning. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 551-557. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.044

Kadir, D. (2015). Applied statistics: Concept, example and data analysis with SPSS/Lisrel program in education. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kaur , M. (2013). Blended learning - its challenges and future. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 612-617. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.248

Koksal, M. S. (2013). A comprehensive research design for experimental studies in science education. Elementary Education Online, 12(3), 628-634. Retrieved from

Komaidi, D. (2007). I can write: A compelte practical guidance to write creatively. Yogyakarta: Sabda Media.

Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández , A. (2009). The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics. Computers & Education, 52, 35-44.

Mifflin, H. (2000). The free dictionary.

Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using Blended learning in learning and ace-to-face instruction. nternational Journal on E-learning, 5(3), 313-337.

Mosa, A., Yoo, I., & Sheets, L. (2011). A systematic review of healthcare applications for smartphones. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 12, 67.

Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013, July). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15-23. doi:

Muthalib, A. A., Abdelsatar, A., Salameh, M., & Dalle, J. (2011). Making learning ubiquitous with mobile translator using Optical Character Recognition (OCR). 2011 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (pp. 233-236). Kuala Lumpur: IEEE.

Nazarenko, A. L. (2015, August 22). Blended learning vs traditional learning: What works? (A case study research). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 200, 77-82. doi:

Nemeth, J., & Long, J. G. (2012). Assessing learning outcomes in U.S. planning studio courses. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(4), 476-490. doi:

Nodoushan, M. S. (2014, September). Assessing writing: A review of the main trends. Studies in English Language and Education, 1(2), 128-138. doi:10.24815/siele.v1i2.1831

Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for teachers. Edinburgh, Harlow, England: Longman.

Okaz, A. A. (2015). Integrating blended learning in Higher Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 600-623. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.086

Oproiu, G. C. (2015). A study about using e-learning platform (Moodle) in University teaching process. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 426-432. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.140

Oweis, T. I. (2018, November). Effects of using a blended learning method on students’ achievement and motivation to learn English in Jordan: A pilot case study. Education Research International, 2018, 1-7. doi:

Pardiyono. (2006). Teaching genre-bbased writing. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020, January). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. doi:

Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017, March). Learning motivation and student achievement: description analysis and relationships both. Couns-Edu, 2(1), 42-47. doi:10.23916/002017026010

Rukayah. (2014). The writing skill of 3th grade students of sibulue subdistrict junior high school of bone regency. International journal of linguistics, 6(2).

Sanjaya, W. (2011). Learning process which is oriented on educational process standard. Jakarta: Kencana.

Shomali, Q. (2007). Blended learning: a seminar to ensure the quality of education and academic accreditation. Proceedings of Sixth Conference of the Deans of the Faculties of Arts in the Universities Members in the Association of Arab Universities. Jinan University.

Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning program. Educational Technology, 43, 51-54.

Stockwell, B. R., Stockwell, M. S., Cennamo, M., & Jiang, E. (2015, August 27). Blended learning improves science education. Cell, 162(5), 933-936. doi:

Suppasetseree, S., & Dennis, N. (2010). The use of Moodle for teaching and learning English at tertiary level in Thailand. The International Journal of the Humanities, 8(6), 29-46. doi:10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i06/42964

Szadziewska, A., & Kujawski, J. (2016). The Usefulness of the blended-learning Method in the opinion of full-time students of the Gdansk University. Proceedings of EDULEARN 2016 Conference, (pp. 1792-1801). Barcelona.

Szadziewska, A., & Kujawski, J. (2017). Advantages and disadvantages of the blended-learning method used in the educational process at the Faculty of Management at the University of Gdansk, in the opinion of undergraduate students. Proceedings of ICERI2017 Conference, (pp. 3938-3946). Seville. doi:10.21125/iceri.2017.1051

Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439-443. doi:

Weigle, S. C. (2007, September). Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 194-209. doi:

Yağci, H., Çinarbaş, H. I., & Hoş, R. (2016). Turkish EFL students’ perceptions about blended English courses in a teacher education program. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 2(3), 959-972. Retrieved from

Zacarias, E., R de Almeida, L., Prettz, J. B., L da Costa, J. P., P de Freitas, E., Canedo, E. D., & T de Sousa Junior, R. (2016). Optimizing the access records of students in the Moodle virtual learning environment database. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49-30, 98-101. doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.135


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.