Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Peer Review Process

Each accepted manuscript of JMEA will go through a review process by the Editor and reviewers, using a Double-blind Peer-Review Process in which the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author does not know the identity of the reviewer.

Each manuscript received will be sent to Reviewers who registered in JMEA. The review process lasts a maximum of up to 30 (thirty) days with the allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete its review process being a maximum of ten (10) working days. If the previous peer-reviewer is not able to finish the review work within the time limit specified then Editor-in-Chief will appoint a surrogate reviewer to do a review manuscript.

In the review process, reviewers provide considerations relating to compatibility between the title, abstract, introduction, discussion (results), and conclusion. In addition, the reviewer also gives consideration associated with novelty, scientific impact, and references used

Review Process:

1. Author submit the manuscript

2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]

3. Double-blind peer review process

4. Editor Decision (Accepted Submission, Revisions Required, Resubmit For Review, Decline Submission)

5. Confirmation to the authors

The final decision of article acceptance will be made by Editors according to reviewers' comments. Publication of accepted articles including the sequence of published articles will be made by the Editor-in-Chief by considering the sequence of accepted dates and geographical distribution of authors.

EDITORIAL PROCESS

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

This Publication Ethics is a statement of the scientific code of ethics of the various parties involved in the publication process of Perception: Communication Journal, consisting of managers, editors, reviewers and authors. The statement in this Scientific Publication Ethics Code essentially upholds three ethical values in publications, namely (i) neutrality, which is free from conflicts of interest in the management of publications; (ii) fairness, which gives authorship rights to those entitled to them; and (iii) honesty, which is free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications.

Publisher's responsibility

1. Publisher of JMEA is responsible for publishing manuscripts that have undergone the process of editing, peer review, and layout in accordance with the rules for the publication of scientific journals.
2. The publisher is responsible for ensuring the academic freedom of editors and reviewers in the performance of their respective duties.
3. The publisher is responsible for the protection of privacy, intellectual property, copyright and editorial freedom.

Editorial responsibilities

1. The Editor of JMEA is responsible for deciding which manuscripts are suitable for publication through editorial board meetings that take into account applicable legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, reproduction, data fabrication, data falsification and plagiarism.
2. In the process of reviewing and accepting manuscripts, the editorial team will apply the principle of equal treatment in deciding whether to publish manuscripts, without distinction as to the race, gender, religion, ethnicity, nationality or political ideology of the author.
3. The editors and editorial team will not disclose any information about the manuscript or the author without the author's permission.
4. Unpublished manuscripts will not be used by the editors for their own research and will be returned directly to the authors.

Peer reviewer responsibilities

1. The reviewers of JMEA assist the editors in making editorial decisions about manuscripts.
2. Reviewers are responsible for the recommendations they make on the manuscripts they review.
3. Reviews of manuscripts will be objective and supported by clear arguments.
4. Peer reviewers are responsible for citations, references, duplication, fabrication of data, falsification of data and plagiarism in the manuscripts they review.
5. Reviewers must always maintain the confidentiality of information and must not use information from the manuscripts they review for personal gain/interest.

Responsibility of the author

1. Authors must present the manuscript of their thoughts or research clearly, honestly and without duplication, fabrication of data, falsification of data and plagiarism.
2. The author is responsible for the confirmation submitted on the written manuscript.
3. The author must indicate the source of opinions and works of others quoted.
4. Authors must write manuscripts ethically, honestly and responsibly, in accordance with the applicable rules of scientific writing.
5. The author does not object to the manuscript being edited during the review and layout process without changing the substance or main idea of the paper.

Indexing

Plagiarisme Check

Articles must pass a plagiarism check using Turnitin with a maximum score of 30%. Articles with a Turnitin score greater than 30% will be returned to the author. 

Author Fees

Article publication: 100.000.00 (IDR)
If this manuscript is published, you will be charged the article publication fee.

Contact

Statistic Visite

Indexing

 

Journal of Mathematics Education and Application: JMEA

University Muhammadiyah of Sumatera Utara

Magister Pendidikan Matematika Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara, Jl. Denai No 217, Indonesia

email: jmea@umsu.ac.id