Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is a media publication manuscript that contains the results of the Field Research applying peer-reviewed. Manuscripts published in Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam includes the results of scientific research original articles scientific reviews that are new, Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam accepts manuscripts in the field of research that covers scientific fields:

  1. Islamic Education
  2. Islamic education curriculum
  3. Islamic education management
  4. Islamic education methods
  5. Islamic educational institutions
  6. Islamic education concepts


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam implement each accepted manuscript will go through a review process by the Editor and reviewers, using a Double blind Peer-Review Process, which the reviewer does not know the identity of the author, and the author did not know the identity of the reviewer.

Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam implement policies Double Blind Peer-Review, every manuscript received will be sent to Reviewers who registered in the Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam. The review process lasts a maximum of up to 30 (thirty) days with the allocation of time given to each reviewer to complete its review process is a maximum of ten (10) working days. If the partners designated bestari previously not able to finish his review work within the time limit specified then chairman of the Chairman of Editorial Board will appoint a replacement to do a review Reviewers manuscript.

In the review process, reviewers provide considerations relating to compatibility between the title, abstract, introduction, discussion (results) and conclusion. In addition reviewer also give consideration associated with novelty, scientific impact and references used

Review Process:

  1. Author submit the manuscript
  2. Editor Evaluation [some manuscripts are rejected or returned before the review process]
  3. Double-blind peer review process
  4. Editor Decision
  5. Confirmation to the authors



Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.


Publication Ethics

Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam follow the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Ethics - COPE-) in all matters related to the ethics of publication. Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam adapting to meet the highest standards of ethics intended for editors, writers, and Reviewer. Publisher does not have the right to interfere with the integrity of the paper and is only responsible for publishing regularly and on time.


  1. Editor Party Must ensure that writers follow the procedures/rules of writing in the Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam.
  2. The Editor can communicate with the Journal Manager, Editor, and Reviewer other in taking the Final Decision.
  3. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interest
  4. The Editor must provide manuscripts assess objectively without seeing aspects of nationality, ethnicity, political affiliation, ethnicity, race, religion, gender, seniority, or institutional affiliation author.
  5. Editors should refuse assignments when there is a possible conflict of interes.
  6. Editors must ensure that the manuscript sent to reviewers do not contain information about the author, and vice versa.
  7. Decisions editors must be delivered to the author with responses Reviewer, except for responses that are personal or libelous.
  8. Editors should honor requests from writers who refuse individuals to evaluate manuscripts for reasons unacceptable.
  9. When the Editor finds or suspects Violation action writing and conflict authorship, editors can follow the guidelines in the flow diagram in resolving conflict COPE authorship.
  10. Editor and all staff must ensure the confidentiality of all the manuscripts received


  1. Reviewers are asked to provide an assessment of the substance of the manuscript in accordance with the Focus and Scope Journal and provide recommendations on assessment.
  2. Reviewers are asked to provide comments on the manuscript, if it is suspected find procedural mistakes of writing, publishing and publishing ethics
  3. Mitra Bestari can complete work on at a predetermined time and provide information to the editor if they are unable to meet the time limit specified.
  4. Reviewers must be able to be confidential manuscripts Author.
  5.  Reviewers should not accept manuscripts for appraisal, if potential conflicts of interest, both individually and collaboratively with any institution.
  6. Reviewers should ask for consideration to the Editor on the similarity of substance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration or manuscript that was published more in common with Author or other.
  7. privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain.


  1. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and not plagiarism.
  2. The author must ensure that the manuscript has not been published previously and have never been assigned the rights to the article to the other party.
  3. The author ensures that manuscript Send tends to the work itself and follow the standard rules in accordance with the format quoting the appropriate reference.
  4. The author must ensure that the manuscript is original and does not engage in plagiarism or automatic plagiarism and Self-Plagiarism.
  5. Authors must follow the procedures established of Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam.
  6. The author does not send the manuscript together with the same topic and title to another journal.
  7. Authors should be able to provide information and make research data related details when the editor discovered the alleged doubts or falsification or plagiarism in the manuscripts. If the author finds any errors or inaccuracies that affect the manuscript which has been sent, the writer must promptly notify the Editor to immediately withdraw the manuscript writing and repairing.
  8. The author is not allowed to withdraw the article being reviewed by the reviewer before being restored by a Reviewer to the Editor.


Submission Guidelines

Submission Guidelines Manuscripts must be submitted via online, with the following steps:

  1. Online paper submited in the portal E-Journal of Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan agama Islam, link: http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ARRASYID/user/register
  2. Select Menu REGISTER on the homepage, author registering as a Writer (Checking role as Author) at the address: http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/ARRASYID/user/register
  3. Once Writer login as Author, click on "New Submission". Stages submit an article consists of five stages, namely: (1). Start, (2). Upload Submission, (3). Enter Metadata, (4). Upload Supplementary Files, (5). confirmation
  4. Start section, select the Journal Section (Full Article), check all the options
  5. In the Upload Submission, please upload the manuscript file in MS Word (doc) article in this section
  6. In the Enter Metadata, data enter all Writers and their affiliates, followed by the title and abstract, and indexing keywords.
  7. Upload Supplementary Files in part, is allowed to upload files data to support or cover letter or another document.
  8. On the Confirmation, please click "Finish Submission" if all the information is correct. DOWNLOAD SUBMISSION GUIDELINES



Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam is abstracting & indexing in the following databases:



References Management

References to other publications must be in American Psychological Association (APA) style and carefully checked for completeness, accuracy and consistency. Use Reference Management by Mendeley, Zetero, EndNote.





The papers published in the Ar-Rasyid: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam will be consider to retract in the publication if : They have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabri-cation) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error). The findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission orjustification (i.e. cases of redundant publication) it constitutes plagiarism it reports unethical research The mechanism of retraction follow the Retraction Guidelines of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) which can be accessed at https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines.pdf


Plagiarism Check

All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection softaware to do the similarity checking. Editors check the plagiarism detection of articles in this journal by using a Turnitin Software & Plagiarism Checker Sofware