Power of Partnership: Exploring Speech Acts in Movie Dialogues in Affecting Narrative and Character Development in "Bad Boys: Ride or Die"
Abstract
This study explores the use of speech act theory within the use of framework multimodal pragmatics to analyze the dialogues in Bad Boys: Ride or Die (2024). Focusing on the five main key of speech act categories such as assertives, directives, commissives, expressives, and declarations. The researchers investigate how these speech acts can make a character development, make an interesting narrative plot, and character relationships. Using a descriptive qualitative methodology, this research examines not only the verbal content of the dialogues but also the multimodal aspects such as body language, facial expressions, and tone, which work in order to reinforce and enhance the intended meanings. Through this approach, the study highlights the dynamic connection between verbal and non-verbal communication, revealing how speech acts influence the film’s emotional elements, such as loyalty, power, and emotional intensity. The findings demonstrate how speech acts drive plot advancement while also offering deeper insights into character motivations and emotional states. By using this multimodal framework, the research provides a comprehensive understanding of how pragmatic meaning is carried in cinematic dialogues, offering a valuable contribution to film studies and pragmatics. Ultimately, this study showcases the potential of combining multimodal pragmatics with speech act theory to enhance the analysis of modern action films and their intricate communication strategies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016a). The semiotics of multimodality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 56, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.013
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2016b). Multimodal resources and the (re)design of social action. Visual Communication, 15(1), 13-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215607325
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Holmes, J. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Brown & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Politeness: Some universals in language usage (pp. 179–216). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, J. (2011). Depicting the unspoken: The semiotic basis of multimodal communication. In S. Norris (Ed.), Handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 40–58). London, UK: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/etlij.v6i1.22232
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
ISSN: 2716-0831



