An Analysis of Students' English Learning Strategies Based on Oxford's Strategy

Marnita Marnita : University of Riau , Muthia Sandra Riphasa : University of Riau , Tara Duhana : University of Riau
Submitted: 11-06-2026 || Accepted: 20-08-2026 || Published: 20-08-2026

Abstract


This study analyzed students’ English language learning strategies based on the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning. The study employed a quantitative descriptive design involving 30 students. Data were collected through a questionnaire that examined six categories of language learning strategies, namely memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social strategies. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to identify the frequency and level of strategy use among the participants. The findings revealed that all categories of language learning strategies were used at a high level. Among the six categories, compensation strategies were identified as the most frequently used strategies. These strategies enabled students to overcome limitations in language knowledge and maintain communication during English learning activities. Memory and affective strategies were also frequently used, indicating that students actively employed techniques for vocabulary retention and emotional regulation. In addition, cognitive and metacognitive strategies were used to support language processing, learning management, and self-monitoring. Social strategies were found to be the least frequently used category, although they remained within the high level of use. Overall, the findings indicated that students actively employed a variety of language learning strategies to support their English learning process. The study provided valuable insights into students’ strategic learning behavior and highlighted the importance of promoting a balanced use of learning strategies. The results may assist English teachers in designing instructional activities that encourage more effective, autonomous, and communicative language learning.

Keywords


Language Learning Strategies; SILL; EFL Students; Oxford Strategy; English Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. Center for Applied Linguistics.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Rev. ed.). Rineka Cipta.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Daflizar, D., Sulistiyo, U., & Kamil, D. (2022). Language learning strategies and learner autonomy: The case of Indonesian tertiary EFL students. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 257–281.

George, D., & Mallery, P. (2020). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference (16th ed.). Routledge.

Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625

Griffiths, C. (2013). The strategy factor in successful language learning. Multilingual Matters.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Lee, J.-Y. (2023). Language learning strategies used by EFL students: Does their digital fluency matter? Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231166881

Loviani, D., Redjeki, G. P. D., & Widyantoro, A. (2024). A correlational study of language learning strategies and learner autonomy among graduate students in English education in Indonesia. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(2), 683–715. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i2.3569

Magogwe, J. M., & Oliver, R. (2007). The relationship between language learning strategies, proficiency, age, and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of language learners in Botswana. System, 35(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.01.003

Melvina, M., Lengkanawati, N. S., & Wirza, Y. (2020). EFL learners' language learning strategies: Field specialization and gender. International Journal of Education, 13(2), 63–69. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v13i2.20972

Noprivala, N., & Alfian, A. (2024). Language learning strategies used by Indonesian English for medical purposes students in higher education. Learning: Research and Practice, 10(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2024.2317829

O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Rianto, A. (2020). A study of language learning strategy use among Indonesian EFL university students. Register Journal, 13(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.231-256

Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586011

Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 199–227). Cambridge University Press.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/etlij.v7i2.30990

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

ISSN: 2716-0831