Ability Write Reading Summary

Agusnimar Gaurifa

Abstract


The data collection tool used was a written test, namely making a summary of the story of the legend of Malin Kundang, with assessment criteria, namely point 2 length of the summary, main idea, explanatory idea, use of words and sentences according to the contents of the summary with the reading. before the indicator is determined as a means of collecting research data, it is first validated by the three Indonesian language study teachers in a triangulation manner until it is declared fit for use. After the legend manuscript was administered to the respondent, it was processed statistically; with the results as the interval 71-85. Second, from the results of observations of the level of ability obtained information: 1) a description of student learning outcomes in learning obtained data, namely: students who have a high level of ability are 16 people or 40.504%, students who have a moderate level of ability are 9 people or 24.32%, students who have a low level of ability are 13 people or 34.14%. 2) a description of student learning outcomes for each item of question is obtained: for item 1 (ability level 36 people, and medium ability level 1 person), for item 2 (high ability level 22 people, medium ability level 7 people, low ability level 8 people ), for icon 3 (high ability level 24 people, medium ability level 5 people, low ability level 8 people), for item 4 (high ability level 25 people, medium ability level 6 people, medium ability level 7 people, low ability level 28 people) based on the description above, it can be concluded that the students' ability to write a narrative paragraph framework is classified as moderate. This statement is stated as moderate because of the variation in the abilities of students where there are good performers and some are low. So that to determine it, take the middle way, namely moderate.


Keywords


Write, paragraph narrative, student

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, 2002, Basics of Educational Evaluation, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta. Chaer Abdul, Agustina Leonie, 2004, Sisiolinguistics, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta Depdikbud, 2001, Big Indonesian Dictionary, Balai Pustaka, Jakurta.

Depdiknas, 2002, Assessment of Learning Outcomes, Jakarta

Guntur Henry, 1982, Writing as a Language Skill, Space, Bandung.

Hutabarat, EP, 1988, How to Learn, BPK Gunung Mulia, Jakarta. Keraf Goris, 1994, Composition, Nusa Indah, Jakarta

Mulyono, 2003, Learning Difficulties, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta

Najir, Mohammad, 2003, Research Methods, Ghalia, Jakarta.

Subana and Sundrajat, 2001, Basics of Scientific Research, Pustaka Setia, Bandung.

Sudjana. 2002. Statistical Methods, Tarsito, Bandung Sugiyono, 2004, Statistics for Research, Alfabeta, BandungAlfabeta

Sugiyono, 2006,Administrative Research Methods, Bandung.

Suparso and Yunus, 2003, Basic Writing Skills, UT, Jakarta.

Yarigan, 1990, Reading as a Skill, Space, Bandung Yhe Liang Gie, 1988, Efficient Learning Method, Center for Study Progress, Yogyakarta Yim UNIMED Lecturer, 2001, Improving Indonesian Language Skills, Medan




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/ijems.v3i1.5499

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.



Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematics Science

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Kampus Utama
Jl. Kapten Muchtar Basri No.3, Glugur Darat II,Medan
Sumatera Utara-20238
E-mail: ijems@umsu.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.