Optimization of Increasing Teacher Engagement through Strengthening Self-Efficacy, Interpersonal Communication, Organizational Culture and Job Satisfaction

Yefri Edowai, Andi Hermawan, Soewarto Hardhienata

Abstract


The unity of teachers with the organization where they work, where the teacher feels that he has an organization and enjoys the conditions of the organization and his work, not only physically but also rationally, emotionally and normatively, so that the teacher feels satisfied and loyal to work in his organization is called teacher engagement. Optimal teacher engagement behavior will have a positive impact on the performance of their work and the madrasah institution. With a sense of love for their work and institution, teachers in carrying out their work work without knowing the time and fully invest themselves and their energy because they are no longer carrying out obligations, but the teaching profession has become a service. in his life. The aim of this research is to find strategies and ways to increase teacher engagement by conducting research on the influence of the variables of self-efficacy, interpersonal communication, organizational support and job satisfaction. This research uses the path analysis method to determine the influence between the variables studied and the SITOREM method for indicator analysis to obtain optimal solutions to increase teacher engagement.

Keywords


Teacher Engagement; Self-Efficacy; Interpersonal Communication; Organizational Culture; Job Satisfaction; SITOREM Analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ababneh, O. M. A. (2021). How do green HRM practices affect employees’ green behaviors? The role of employee engagement and personality attributes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 64(7), 1204–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1814708

Abun, D., Menor, R. I., Catabagan, N. C., Magallanes, T., & Ranay, F. B. (2021). Organizational climate and work engagement of employees of divine word colleges in Ilocos Region, Philippines. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i1.1017

Agarwal, S., & Mewafarosh, R. (2021). Linkage of Social Media Engagement With Fomo and Subjective Well Being. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 13(7), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.06.21/06

Fred Luthans. (2011). Organizational Behavior: An Evidence-Based Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 149-150.

Aaron J. Elkins.(2015).”Organizational Citizenship Behavior and School Librarians” School of Library and Information Studies Texas Women’s University, USA Vol 21.No 2.

Marquardt, Michael J.. 2002. Building the Learning Organization : Mastering the 5 Elements for Corporate Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Davies- Black Publishing,Inc.

Murray, E. Jennex. 2008. Knowledge Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications. New York: Information Science Reference.

Leung, Chan, & Lee, Lee, T. Y., Leung, H. K., & Chan, K. C. 2013. “Improving quality management on the basis of ISO 9000”. The TQM Magazine, 11(2)

Stoltz, G. P. (2007). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (T. Hermaya, Ed.). Jakarta: Grasindo.

Green, A. (2006). Models of Lifelong Learning and the ‘knowledge society.’ Compare, 36(3), 307–325.

Shivaranjani. (2014). Adversity Quotient: One Stop Solution to Combat Attribution Rate of Women in Indian it Sector. Journal of Business and Administration Research Review, 1(5), 181–189.

Roosseno. (2008). Jembatan dan Menjembatani (W. Wangsadinata & G. Suprayitno, Eds.). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Santos, M. C. J. (2012). Assessing the Effectiveness of the Adapted Adversity Quotient Program in a Spesial Education School. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 3(4), 13–23.

Kinicki, A., & Fugate, M. (2016). Organizational behavior : a practical, problem-solving approach. In McGraw-Hill Education (First inte). McGraw-Hill Education Singapore. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/930003718

Robbins, Stephen A. dan Timothy A. Judge. (2018). Essential of Organizational Behavior. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (2016). Organizational Behavior. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (7th ed., Vol. 6, Issue August). John Wiley & Sons.

Gibson, J. L., Donnelly Jr, J. H., Ivancevich, J. M., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizational Behavior, Structure, and Processes (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2019). ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR Improving Performance and Commitment (6th ed.).

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior. Pearson.

Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership. Hoboken: Wiley.

Bauer, Talya and Erdogan, Berrin. (2012). An Introduction to Organizational Behavior. Unnamed Publisher, Inc

Joseph, O. O., & Kibera, F. (2019). Organizational culture and performance: Evidence from microfinance institutions in Kenya. SAGE open, 9(1), 2158244019835934.

Ganyang, Machmed Tun. (2018). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Konsep dan Realita). Bogor: IN MEDIA

Buchanan, D. A., & Huczynski, A. A. (2019). Organizational behaviour. Pearson UK.

Schermerhorn, J. R. (2013). Management (12th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wexley, K. N., & Yukl, G. A. (2005). Perilaku organisasi dan psikologi personalia. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Gomes, F. C. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Hardhienata, S. (2017). The development of scientific identification theory to conduct operation research in education management. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 166(1), 012007.

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2010). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

John M. Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske and Michael T. Matteson, Organization Behavior and Management, Eight Editon (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008), h. 361

Bolino, M.C., Turnley, W.H., dan Bloodgood, J.M. (2002). Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organization‖. Academy of

Management Journal, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2002 pp. 502 – 522 Jennifer M. George, Gareth R. Jones, Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior” (New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002), h. 95

Angelo Knicki, Brian K. Williams; Management: A. Practical Introduction‖ Third Edition (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2008) p.359

J.A. C0lquitt, J.A Lepine, M.J. Wesson,Organizational Behavior‖. New York: McGraw Hill,2011, pp. 294-296

James L. Gibson, et.al, Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2012), h. 107

Stephen P. Robbins dan Timothy A. Judge, Organizational behavior, 11th Edition (New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2013), h. 133.

Fred Luthans, OrganizationIal Behavior”, twelfth edition (New York: McGrawHill internasional Editon, 2011) hh. 252-253.

Hellriegel dan Slocum. 2011. Organizational Behavior 13th edition. South-Western Cengage Learning: USA.

Richard M. Ryckman, Theories of Personality (USA: Thomson Higher Education, 2008), h. 4

John R. Schermerhorn, et. al., “Organizational Behavior”, Edition (New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2011), h. 406.

Richard L Daft, Management, Eight Edition, (Printed in the United States of America,2008), h.563

Devito, J.A (2009) Interpersonal Communication Book, New York, Pearson Educational, Inc.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/ijems.v5i2.19029

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematics Science

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Kampus Utama
Jl. Kapten Muchtar Basri No.3, Glugur Darat II,Medan
Sumatera Utara-20238
E-mail: ijems@umsu.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.