Integrating Moodle-Based Learning Innovation for Digital Pedagogy

Asrar Aspia Manurung, Putri Rizki Syafrayani

Abstract


Technological advancement continues to redefine the landscape of education, promoting a transition from traditional instruction to digital pedagogy. One manifestation of this shift is the integration of Moodle as a web-based interactive learning platform. This study explores the innovative integration of Moodle in distance learning through a systematic literature review. Nine scholarly articles were analyzed to identify how Moodle contributes to interactive online learning, the pedagogical benefits it offers, and the barriers that challenge its implementation. Findings indicate that Moodle supports dynamic learning through flexible access, collaboration, and interactive design. However, technical constraints and communication issues may limit satisfaction among users. Educational institutions are encouraged to innovate pedagogically by optimizing Moodle features to create engaging and inclusive digital classrooms.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahn, J., & Lee, H. (2024). Digital transformation in higher education: Reimagining pedagogy through learning management systems. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00450-2

Aldosemani, T., & Alqahtani, A. (2025). Leveraging Moodle for inclusive and adaptive online learning: A pedagogical innovation framework. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-12244-7

Al-Mekhlafi, A. M., Singh, R., & Yoon, J. (2024). Designing reflective and data-driven learning through LMS analytics: A case of Moodle-based instruction. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218

Damnjanovic, V., Jednak, S., & Mijatovic, I. (2015). Factors affecting the effectiveness and use of Moodle: Students’ perception. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.789062

Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2024). Technology integration in higher education: Lessons from post-pandemic teaching innovations. Computers & Education, 213, 105212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105212

Horvat, A., Dobrota, M., Krsmanovic, M., & Cudanov, M. (2015). Student perception of Moodle learning management system: A satisfaction and significance analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(4), 515–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.788033

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Ferreira, M. P. (2024). The role of systematic literature reviews in education research: Enhancing transparency and theoretical contribution. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102208

Kumari, P., Joshi, M., & Rahman, S. (2024). Reinventing learning with Moodle: Pedagogical affordances and challenges in higher education. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 15–27.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2024). Thematic analysis: Advancing qualitative rigor in education research. Qualitative Research in Education, 13(1), 50–68.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372(71), n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Rahman, F., Harun, R., & Lim, C. (2025). Emerging trends in digital pedagogy: The role of LMS in equitable higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 18(1), 75–89.

Sabah, N. M. (2020). Motivation factors and barriers to the continuous use of blended learning approach using Moodle: Students’ perceptions and individual differences. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(8), 875–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1623323

Shahroom, A. A., Jalal, S., & Rahim, R. (2024). Educator readiness and pedagogical innovation in post-pandemic learning environments. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12(1), 102–118.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Zhao, H., & Park, E. (2024). Enhancing learner engagement through Moodle-based hybrid instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 645–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2312449




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/ijems.v7i1.28775

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematics Science

Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Kampus Utama
Jl. Kapten Muchtar Basri No.3, Glugur Darat II,Medan
Sumatera Utara-20238

Kontak: 0819-4593-7110
E-mail: ijems@umsu.ac.id

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.